Comment Re:Scientific review (Score 1) 244
It makes me really sad that someone actually believes this.
It makes me really sad that someone actually believes this.
No, lies based on falsified data solely for the benefit of greater control over our society is winning.
I'm on my 33rd Iran War Calendar.
C02 isn't a pollutant, unless you consider the act of breathing to be totally unnatural for animal life. However it's for that exact reason it's trying to be painted as a pollutant.
Sure it's possible, because ANYTHING is possible. What's lacking is any form of actual hard science to back the theory up. All I see is fabricated data and corrupt models promulgated by politicians in the name of more control.
Look at the idiocy surrounding "Climate Change". Even so-called scientists are turning away from real science.
Last I saw it had everything but a decent text editor.
Distance DOES matter to lasers, take a look at all of the work they've done on the Airborne Laser to reduce diffraction.
Thus spake the master programmer: "When a program is being tested, it is too late to make design changes." -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"