The reason is that it is hard to fire a federal employee is so that the positions are not used to reward political allies and contributors every time someone new is elected.
I'm pretty sure any sane lawyer in the world would absolutely forbid him from talking publicly about Mt. Gox or anything that happened during the meltdown.
Is there not legal action pending? Perhaps we should let the discovery process do work as intended. This article seems to accomplish nothing and I don't think it qualifies as news.
I'm in Atlanta so I'm subject to the caps and I looked into this. The business plans are quite a bit more expensive and they come with 2 year contracts. If you want to get out of your contract you have to pay 75% of the remaining value of the contract.
These petitions have been mostly worthless in the past. See this previous petition about net neutrality: https://petitions.whitehouse.g...
The FCC is nominally an independent agency so the best way to make yourself heard is to file a comment on Proceeding 14-28 at: http://www.fcc.gov/comments
They don't need to be publicly owned (think the government snoops now?) but they do need to be designated Common Carriers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...
If you read that and agree, consider filing a public comment on Proceeding 14-28 at: http://www.fcc.gov/comments
Posted
by
timothy
from the cry-wolf-phenomenon dept.
MetaNick writes "It seems with every worldwide sporting event, e.g., Olympics, World Cup, we hear warnings of a "meltdown" as more and more broadband users attempt to stream video of the event to their browsers. And such predictions have just begun for the World Cup just getting underway: World Cup streaming to cause network meltdown, World Cup by broadband endangers networks. Has this ever really happened? Will it happen with this the World Cup just getting underway? I tend to doubt it. I looked for articles discussing how predictions of meltdowns did NOT come to pass, but I couldn't find any."