Re:Enough! (Score 2, Insightful)

I read the article yesterday. IIRC, one of the arguments for transplanting the animals is the lack of control some Asian and African governments have in controlling poachers and other encroachers of habitat. I understand the Darwinian argument, but I just have a hard time believing that poachers killing needlessly to produce fur and ivory products is what Darwin had in mind regarding "survival of the fittest." I would like to believe that necessity dictated by nature, not people's aestethic "wants", is what drives Darwinism.