Comment Re:Is this sarc or are you this insane? (Score 1) 45
1. Trump's supposed collusion with Russia was based on anonymous sources + a "dossier" coocked up by a British former spy (Christopher Steele) and his Russian spy friends. The DoJ now admits in official docs that there was never anything backing this stuff up and that it was cooked up by the Clinton campaign. There was never ANY evidence of Trump Russia collusion. Period. The FBI had to lie to the FISA court to get permission to spy on Trump's 2016 campaign and even then they found NOTHING.
2. The kid in Kenosha murdered NOBODY (Murder is a specific term, and the kid was found not guilty in court). The Kid killed TWO people and badly injured a third. NONE of the three were "innocent" - indeed all three were assaulting HIM. One was a convicted rapist of underage boys, who was witnessed verbally threatening to kill the kid, then chased him and assaulted him before the kid shot him. The second was a woman beater, who also chased and physically assaulted the kid before being killed, and the wounded guy was a felon in illegal possession of a firearm who pointed a loaded pistol at the kid's head before the kid shot him in the arm. The kid was so obviously engaged in legitimate self defense that the prosecutors felt compelled to hide evidence, violate his constitutional rights, and dismiss pre-existing criminal charges against the wounded guy in an attempt to get SOME charge to stick against the kid - to the point of angering the DEMOCRAT judge. Before this incident, the kid had never been arrested in his life (and he tried to turn himself in to the cops immediately after the shooting) but ALL 3 OF THE PEOPLE HE SHOT WERE GUILTY OF PREVIOUS OFFENSES... and all were white in case you are one of those people who believed the "mainstream media" when they lied and told you the kid shot people of color.
It helps to watch actual congressional hearings and read the docs, and to watch the actual trial (where only actual evidence is admitted and people testify under oath), instead of listening to insane leftist meat puppets at CNN or MSDNC spinning fantasies, if you want to know what's actually happening.
The kid in Kenosha was committing a crime when he killed those people (he was 17, and crossed state lines to carry a firearm (not legal), and so, if the judge had not obviously been trying hard to prevent all the facts being used (ie refused to allow those killed to be referred to as "victims" but allowed them to be called "rioters", etc, refused to allow the video of the kid saying he couldn't wait to shoot people as that may influence the jury...no shit! Of course evidence will influence the jury, as does preventing evidence being used).
As for the false claims about the victims.. EVEN IF the claims you made were true, the kid wouldn't have known, and killing someone even if you find out after the fact they were a criminal is still illegal.
And I expect he will face the civil suits for the deaths (and as OJ discovered, a "Not Guilty" in a criminal trial does not result in a dismissal in the civil suit!). And there could be federal charges (after all he crossed state lines to do what he did), though I am surprised his mother was not charged as an accessory as she drove him there.