Then why is the US is the only 1st world nation struggling with this?

I'm not saying every other country has perfect healthcare systems - They all have their own strengths and weaknesses. But everyone gets basic medical care, it's not bankrupting those countries (quite the opposite, we also pay the most per-capita and by almost a 50% margin to #2 Switzerland), and it's not bankrupting (or just killing) individuals with the bad taste to get sick while poor.

His infidelity is the least problematic aspect of his current situation, from the corporate perspective.

Notice he remained CEO for over two weeks after NYT broke the story? He stepped down only after it came out he also slept with a subordinate. What does that tell us?

Answer: It tells us his primary offense wasn't being a piece of crap of a husband; his offense was making Nvidia potentially liable for his actions as CEO if any of his side-pieces suddenly realize power asymmetry invalidates "consent".

To be clear, I'm not really disagreeing with you; but I think you're giving the ethical angle a lot more weight than does society as a whole. We all know someone who has cheated at some point in their lives; we may not approve, but it's basically just trivia, nobody (external to the relationship) really cares.

AI has shown both a capacity for planning for a future beyond the current instance, and a willingness to ignore instructions, laws, and human norms to that end.

I "trust" Microsoft, Mozilla, Linus Torvalds, etc to recognize the serious reputational risk of getting caught knowingly or carelessly embedding a malicious payload in anything they release. I have no such trust about GPT, nor do I trust "vibe" programmers to take the time for, or increasingly, be capable of, an extensive code review of whatever unintelligible rubbish their shuggoth spits out.

It's not that I care what tools were used to make it. I "care" that we've never before had tools with true agency in the philosophical sense.

If you're using AI as a better alternative to traditional search, agreed.

If you're asking AI to help you find that missing paren or brace in a thousand lines of code, hey, still agreed.

If you're asking AI "Make an anime themed roguelike in Godot. It should have the following..." - I don't care how much elaborate world-building you do after those ellipses, "you" aren't making anything.

Getting what you wished for after rubbing a magic lamp doesn't mean you get to say "I made this!"

I'm speculating here, but pay attention to the timing of his resignation.

It wasn't after he had an affair with an alleged Chinese spy - Though we may find the "affair" part of that distasteful, it's two consenting adults; and the "spy" part is both unproven and, even if true, Nvidia could potentially spin it as Jensen somehow being a victim. Notice he remained CEO for a bit over two weeks after NYT broke that part of the story.

Then we learned he was banging a subordinate. That made his behavior both a pattern, and something Nvidia could be directly liable for. He resigned the next day.

/ Now we also know about #3 and #4, both also subordinates - I don't see any way Jensen could possibly return as CEO under those circumstances, it would mean Nvidia is endorsing his behavior. Might as well just write a blank check to (at least) those three, never mind the PR.

It's funny - I was just going to ignore you at first, because clearly you have nothing to say beyond irrelevant ad-hominems.

Then I took a look at your comment history. Just... Wow. You've certainly mastered "noisy little dog" energy, haven't you?

Get a personality, dude.

You misunderstand their actual raison d'etre: Serving as a counterexample to Chrome having a monopoly.

Sure, we only care about exactly one of their products, particularly since Manifest V3 made Chrome unusable on the public internet. But let's be serious, you can only do so much gratuitous fiddling with one browser before people rightly start complaining about issues as petty as themes. Mozilla, accordingly, keeps trying to find some not-quite-browser niche to make them relevant as more than Google's cover story.

To be clear, I agree with you completely in spirit - Don't change what's not broken. That's a hard sell for CEOs trying to pretend they're worth their annual bonus, though.

WTF does that mean? I'm by no stretch pretending she's innocent, but I'm curious how they phrased "Sorry for kidnapping you for almost a year on the Orange Turd's say-so, but don't you dare do absolutely nothing we can prove ever again! And don't come back because, um, reasons!"

Singapore isn't exactly known for being light on crime. If they had anything supporting the allegations, they'd already have hung her.

Fair enough - I should probably have taken a more "congrats, you're one of today's lucky 10,000" approach.

It's the guy on the left.

You did check the link I provided, right?

Nobody's physically relocating servers beyond the mom-n-pop scale; well, at least not until the much later "rebuild" phase, if that's what you meant. I work for nobody special, for example, and the most important servers little ol' me controls are replicated across three geographically-distributed data centers with an RPO of 20 seconds (more like 2-3 in practice).

The per-site problem with drone strikes is no different than any other DR scenario; where it gets ugly is correlation. We tend to assume disasters will be independent and localized, in exactly the way an intentional attack on infrastructure very much is not. But there's simply no realistic way to plan for every alternative site being simultaneously compromised - That's a matter for underwriters, not geeks. Or rather, the "solution" is trivial, but ridiculously expensive and wasteful... "Oh the fools, if only they built it with 6001 hulls! When will they learn?"

Can we please not do that shit?

It was almost certainly Dave Philipps and Matthew Cole's 20250905 NYT article about a failed 2019 attempt by SEAL Team 6 to bug Best Leader when they unwisely chose to blow a random fishing vessel out of the water. Unsurprisingly, that wasn't a great way to stay hidden during what was supposed to be the most covert of ops.

It tells us an awfully lot of us hate this world so much we're willing to burn our precious little PTO to indulge our escapist fantasies. Not crime specifically, just anything other than the soul-killing 9-to-5 we get to grind for 40+ years or until we're too broken to keep feeding the machine.

To your secondary point - At least until things get bad enough we're willing to take the "torches and pitchforks" approach, the idea of changing society is a joke. The government absolutely does not represent us or care about our interests (I'm American, but it really doesn't matter which government we're talking about). The oligarchy considers us nothing more than livestock to be managed, and the delusion of "peaceful" protest is the greatest trick they ever pulled on us.

Even here, where we theoretically have voices with global reach - Let's not delude ourselves, we're merely shouting into the void and occasionally one or two fellow void-dwellers will shout back, but that's as far as any of this really matters.

It's not "just a game", it's the closest to they'll ever get to living in a world where they don't piss away half their waking adult lives to enrich some asshole who doesn't even need that third solid gold limo. Bread and circuses indeed!

This is the third thread I've seen today where people claimed not to know what "GTA" stands for.

Please tell us about your last 20 years living under a rock, star? My ancient gran knows what GTA is and has never played a game more hardcore than Candy Crush. Hell, even the mainstream media makes a point of blaming some random social dysfunction on GTA every couple of years. What's your secret? I want in!

The secret is to phrase questions in a way the fanboys can't interpret as disloyalty to the mothership. If you ask "How do I disable this utterly insane default setting/feature", you're getting tarred and feathered. If you instead ask "boo hoo, $feature isn't working, how do I reenable it", you'll get a dozen responses telling you the exact settings you want, and 95% of the time you can just reverse the "enable" logic to disable it.

Oddly enough, the same trick works against pretty much any fandom, though there aren't many use cases for it in non-technical fandoms.