Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:the 9/11 hijackers (Score 1) 389

We have a lot in common. because i see dumb dimwitted slow moving, but well intentioned bumblers. Also.

And judging by your comments, you believe the official story of 911, Oklahoma, etc, I don't. That's the difference. Have you spent hours researching each element, I have. On 9/12 I was gung-ho, right wing consitutional republican, blow them up, etc. The only difference is when someone tells me something outlandish, I actually take the time to do the research, which most don't. Not because their bad people, not because their stupid, they simply may not have the time, energy, or assume that everyone is like them, good people, which I also did. I'd say, I wouldn't do something that evil, therefore, they couldn't either. The thing I always ask myself however is, does it matter. If what X says is true, does it affect how I react to the world. The answer to that question in regard to the loss of 3000+ of my countrymen is yes. If you are not aware of the specifics of an alternative view, then you cannot logically refute them. The simple fact is, the world does not exist in the manner you think it does. I didn't believe it either, and I wish it wasn't true, and that you are right. Because I want a normal life just as you think it to exist, just like everyone else. And hopefully for the rest of world, I am crazy, and suffer from a grand delusion.

Yet I think your problem is that you believe America is innately a benevolent government with occasional mistakes, but never intentional. As were my thoughts. However, the constitutional debates of 1787 was based upon that opposite principal, and rather as Pane would put it "Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one."

The constitution by design limited that intolerable evil, but not destroyed it. And further by design, we should see that tyranny coming form government was not only anticipated, but expected.

The question that should logically arise is what makes us any different from any other tyrannical republic (structurally, not historically). For after all, Hitler was elected, and Germany, as America, was a republic. Hitler, under the guise of terrorism suspended civil liberties which was thought to be "temporary" to cope with a terrorist threat, caused by the burned down the Reichstag (Parliament) building which was blamed on the Communists to justify such actions, as have been the attempt in our case via the Patriot Act, Executive orders, NSD, etc, etc.

I'm not suggesting that our soldiers, congress, police are in some elite plot to abuse the people, just I as assert that German soldiers and politicians didn't want to exterminate jews and other plights. No large body will consciously perpetrate such notorieties, largely because their difficult to keep secret ( in addition, I don't think their that many evil people in the world). Nevertheless, these things have and do happen so what makes us any different? Certainly not our constitution (which was the correct answer), that document hasn't been used for sometime (apprx 1945+). It's only paid lip service because if you think your free, you won't fight for freedom. Too simple, I know.

The Christians during the crusades killed many sinners for noble cause, to spread the truth and tranquility and most importantly, salvation. They hear, your family will respect and love you; you will go to heaven with honor when you die. We kill people and surrender our liberties to spread freedom, also another noble cause. No solider is ever told their going to kill for land, money, and power, and that their cause for war was a hoax, for their would no volunteers as no man would leave their family, kill another mans family, for fruits he will never receive or for a cause most would find immoral.

Nor do I suggest that America, in any form, is trying to conquer the world as Germany did, rather I imply America is a delusion that "we the people suffer" from, not the elite that run it and other nations. (as with most forms of nationalism today) It is used as a tool, for the masses to follow, as was the case in Christendom. The leadership never has to follow their own rules, only their subjects which includes you and me. We have come to admire a flag, and not principles of its stripes. It is for this reason State government is so important; it is the last remaining voice we have.

Only the devil will say, trust me. I'm saying don't believe me, research it for yourself if it is important to you. Best of luck, and Godspeed.

Ps. I'm Christian, and consider myself a patriot who loves his country, soldiers, and most importantly, it's people. I say this because it must clear that I'm making a point, using historical examples, and in no way bare any ideological resemblance to some of those people who call our soldiers "baby killers" or Christians, this or that. Lastly, I get my info from a wall of books, not some holly-wood b movie. Such films of which you refer are the best attempt by those that dearly love this country to inform the populous, because reading does take time. Truth doesn't have the same budget, sorry.

Slashdot Top Deals

"We want to create puppets that pull their own strings." -- Ann Marion "Would this make them Marionettes?" -- Jeff Daiell

Working...