If you and your wife wants to track eachother in case of an emergency, you are free to use other alternatives that does not hide the app from the phone owner.

They want to prevent abusive people from using this app to cause physical or psychological harm. This is a good thing, even if you can think up many examples of legitimate use. And even if the FTC has made bad decision on other topics.

A woman who finally has managed to take the kid and leave an abusive relationship with a violent idiot may think that this is a good decision. Even if you don't care because it does not affect you personally.

https://slashdot.org/tag/clint... There were quite a few entries on the subject. Good research.

"no known bacteria that's harmful to man can survive in beer" was what I wrote, and that's true. Infected beer contains no bacteria that's harmful to humans. It can contain plenty of other bacterias though, Beer contains alcohol, alfa-acids, very little to no oxygen and co2. The bacteria that likes it there has no reason to like being inside humans. "Enough alcohol", yes, but it wasn't easy brewing strong beer in those days. Especially considering the bad sanitation.

If you drank water, you could die if it wasn't from a clean source. You can't die from drinking beer. Well, not from bacteria in beer anyway.

Please take into account that the beer made hundreds or thousands of years ago had very little alcohol. Things like enzymes, temperature rests, fermentable extract, FAN and sanitation was unheard of. Beer wasn't usually being drunk to get drunk. Beer was a more healthy alternative to water, since it contains a number of nutrients and energy, and also being harmless to drink since no known bacteria that's harmful to man can survive in beer.

If there is a way, Dogfish Head will surely brew it. But they will probably brew it anyway ;)

Jesus christ. ANOTHER Phoronix post? Isn't this news for nerds - stuff that MATTERS? Phoronix is a link farm where very few posts matter.

Didn't RMS want GNU to have a microkernel?

Considering how bad the articles and journalism is, perhaps you shouldn't put too much faith in the benchmarks of Phoronix.

No, it isn't. Quality isn't at all about how good a beer tastes. That's completly subjective. Quality is brewing a product that comes out just the way you wanted it to, and then brew it again, and again. It's about controll over all the parameters during milling, mashing, lautering, boiling, whirlpooling, cooling, aeration, fermentation, lagering, conditioning, filtration, storage, filling and alot of steps I missed. If a customer thinks a beer doesn't taste good, that's not a sign of bad quality. If a customer drinks a beer that's been infected by bacteria or wild yeast, or damaged by oxygen or light, that's a sign of bad quality.

No, not more than the US has. If you are refering to the reinheitsgebot, it's not a law anymore. Haven't been for decades.

As a european brewer, who has worked for the two largest breweries in my country, two of the smallest and who currently works with planning and installing two new microbreweries, I don't agree. If someone would ask me what's the most difficult beer to brew, I would say Budweiser (if I'm allowed to exclude lambics). Because making a beer that tastes virtually nothing isn't an easy thing to do. And to have every single bottle taste the same is even harder. American breweries have contributed ALOT to the quality aspect of the brewing industry. I don't drink beer with so little taste myself, but I appreciate the quality aspect of it.

Been running mine stable at 1Ghz for two months now. What is new, is the dynamic frequency scaling. Support for that was added like last week.