Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:I guess we'll see about that (Score 1) 84

There is a catch. the Flock Services; doesn't specify to whom. They made it generic on purpose I think. This way in court Flock can argue "it doesn't specify 'provide the Flock Services to the customer". So it could mean to anyone.
It will be interesting how this plays out in court. But I think Flock put in a legal loophole in the TOS.

Comment Re:I guess we'll see about that (Score 1) 84

The products and services is in the and part. The important part is the first part Customer hereby grants to Flock a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to (a) use and disclose Customer Data to provide the Flock Services;.

Comment Flock OWNS your data! (Score 3, Insightful) 84

Flock now claims a perpetual right to use the data those cameras collect. Not for the length of the contract. Indefinitely. A town can cancel Flock next week, lose access to its own footage, and Flock keeps the right to use that data anyway.

Set aside how you feel about the cameras, that argument is already happening everywhere else, and it's not the part that should interest anyone who signs vendor contracts for a living. The lesson here is simpler: a customer's own data-retention policy is worth little if the vendor's terms say otherwise. The retention policy is real right up until it meets the terms of service â" and then the terms win.

The lesson here is simpler: a customer's own data-retention policy is worth little if the vendor's terms say otherwise. The retention policy is real right up until it meets the terms of service â" and then the terms win.

And the terms aren't the only thing that moves. This is the same Flock that, Wired reported this week, has been building tools to identify and track people by their movements â" the exact capability it spent years telling city councils it didn't do. So the promise drifts and the contract drifts, both in the vendor's direction, and the customer learns about it after the fact, if at all.

References the perpetual, worldwide license.

See: 4.1. Customer Data.
"Customer hereby grants to Flock a limited, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide license to (a) use and disclose Customer Data to provide the Flock Services; and (b) use Customer Data to support and improve Flockâ(TM)s products and services."

Last Updated: August 21, 2026
https://www.flocksafety.com/le...

Comment Re: Not with this administration (Score 1) 155

Tell my why Biden didn't release the files when he had them. I'll tell you why NO ONE is releasing them. To many powerful peoples names are in them and don't want their names released. I'm sure JFK threats have been made to stop the releases. So it's not just Dumpy Trump it was also bumbling Biden. And will continue with whomever else takes office.

Comment Number 6! (Score 3, Informative) 22

This makes the 6th data breach they have had. Why anyone would still be using them is a total mystery to me!

There are roughly five -publicly- disclosed security incidents (how many not publicly disclosed?):
2011
2015 - one of the two of the worst
2016
2017
2022 - 2023 - the worst


Now you can add 2026 to the list

Slashdot Top Deals

If I set here and stare at nothing long enough, people might think I'm an engineer working on something. -- S.R. McElroy

Working...