Comment Re:More detail would've been interesting. (Score 1) 40
Except that Richard Hatch DIDN'T win by backstabbing and lying.
He won by building the one and only stable coalition in the game, while the rest of the players bounced around randomly, never thinking to build voting blocs.
The only significant lying was that he denied the existance of the coalition, as did every other member of it. He didn't even deny it that vociferously.
In fact, Hatch was one of the most HONEST players of the game ever -- precisely because a pure coalition building strategy was possible in the first season in a way it was not so much as seasons progressed (in part because of tribe swaps and other twists).
Can anyone tell of even ONE incident of lying or ONE incident of backstabbing that Richard was responsible for during the game?
He won by building the one and only stable coalition in the game, while the rest of the players bounced around randomly, never thinking to build voting blocs.
The only significant lying was that he denied the existance of the coalition, as did every other member of it. He didn't even deny it that vociferously.
In fact, Hatch was one of the most HONEST players of the game ever -- precisely because a pure coalition building strategy was possible in the first season in a way it was not so much as seasons progressed (in part because of tribe swaps and other twists).
Can anyone tell of even ONE incident of lying or ONE incident of backstabbing that Richard was responsible for during the game?
