Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:and if robo car kills an kid who will do the ha (Score 1) 45

and if robo car kills an kid who will do the hard time?

Same as when a person does: no one. Car "accidents" i.e. crashes are treated more like an act of nature than either a collisions cause by an individual making poor decisions, and more importantly (especially in North America) by a system set up to rely as heavily as possible on flawed human decisions with little thought to inherent safety in road design.

Basically, people don't really care.

I think you are wrong. People do hard time in cases of traffic accidents. Especially if it results in fatalities. For example, in Canada:

Impaired driving causing death: 4 to 10 years
Dangerous driving causing death: Up to life
Criminal negligence causing death: 4 to life
Hit and run: Up to life

The above are just general figures.

A few actual examples:

Sentences for fatal vehicle accidents (2020–2025):

High-profile impaired and dangerous driving cases
Brady Robertson (Ontario):
Accident: On June 18, 2020, Robertson killed a mother and her three young daughters in a crash in Brampton, Ontario. He was driving with THC in his system at eight times the legal limit.
Sentence: 17 years in prison, with a 20-year driving ban after his release. He was found guilty of four counts of impaired driving causing death.
Akam Jot Sandu (Ontario):
Accident: On September 11, 2021, Sandu, who was drunk and high on marijuana, drove 124 km/h in a 60 km/h zone and killed a ride-share passenger in a collision.
Sentence: 8 years in prison for impaired and dangerous driving causing death.
Deepak Chararma (Halifax):
Accident: In 2024, Chararma was involved in a fatal hit-and-run that killed a university student in a marked crosswalk.
Sentence: 4 years in prison for criminal negligence causing death. He had fled from two other collisions on the same night and was driving 126 km/h in a 50 km/h zone.
Tara MacMunn (Toronto):
Accident: On April 18, 2023, MacMunn, an unlicensed driver, caused a four-vehicle crash that killed a woman.
Sentence: 4 years in prison after pleading guilty to impaired driving causing death.
Artur Kotula (Toronto):
Accident: On October 12, 2021, Kotula, a suspended driver, sped down a residential street, killing two people in a collision.
Sentence: 6.5 years in prison for dangerous driving causing death. Kotula, who is not a permanent resident, faces deportation after serving his time.
Mathis Veillette (Quebec):
Accident: In 2023, a drunk driver caused a crash that killed Veillette, a passenger in the other car involved.
Sentence: 6 years in prison and a 12-year driving ban for drunk driving.
Truck driver involved in Highway 400 crash (Ontario):
Accident: On June 25, 2021, a truck driver on two hours of sleep caused a highway crash that killed four people, including a family of three.
Sentence: 8 years in prison. The judge stated that a message needed to be sent to the trucking industry about driving without sufficient sleep.

Comment Re:I think that's more indictment of China (Score 1) 171

Pakistan has twice now looked the other way at Major terrorist attacks happening in India rather than warn the government and twice now nothing has come of it because they're not allowed to go to war when it would screw with capitalism.
 

India's official stated position is to foment disturbances and separatist insurgents in Pakistan. Go look up the statements of senior Indian officials (foreign minister, interior minister, etc.), won't be too hard to google. Why would India/Pakistan inform the other side of imminent terrorist attack? During the recent terrorist train hijacking in Pakistan, while the event was ongoing, Indian media gave full coverage to the masked terrorists, lauding them as freedom fighters.

As to war, India has tried limited "surgical strikes" with embarrassing results. India has substantial edge over Pakistan in a conventional war. Consequently, Pakistan hasn't signed any "no first use" of nuclear weapons.

There are hard line dumbasses on both sides and there won't be any progress in the foreseeable future.

Comment Re:No and No (Score 1) 115

You seem to be fixated on one (one in a multi-million) outlying use-case! First of all, a meatball (human) can make a final call after detailed and precise explanation by the chatbot. And before you start another rant about how it isn't possible because of the "law", the "law" isn't set in stone. Also, the law isn't worldwide.

Slashdot Top Deals

Recursion is the root of computation since it trades description for time.

Working...