Noticed, that nowhere in the article did it mention the actual fusion creation or even if that was an omission, that the plasma energy created was in excess of the energy required to make the fusion energy... So fusion is a PR/Marketing word inclusion in a plasma rocket experiment?

Is there a new publication out there? Last one I read said that the event was unprecedented, and as such they did not know what the effects would be, thus had no idea how it would have to be accounted for in the climate prediction models. Not arguing, just looking for more data... From my understanding if you follow the foundational bit of science as we do with CO2, HO2 is a much more efficient reflector of infra-red light (per my understanding). So it would be natural to apply the same assumption to some sort of effect that the models currently do with CO2. However, given the differences in atmospheric levels, heat exchange to space, etc... I'm not sure they know what to do with it... But I don't see it mentioned much in the incessant beat of doom and gloom click bait...

I think I must have seen this as a preprint a month or two ago... My pondering on the paper included: Since H20 is one of the most effective greenhouse molecules, what changes could this have made to the general climate since the first of the year? Since we have never really understood this as an issue, I don't know how climate models could account for it, but an increase this large should have had some effect on the outcomes, or do the models go ahead and forecast without taking another potential variable into account?