Sounds like some useful ideas. However, how much infrastructure and eggs in one basket alike situations (nuclear, gas, coal, etc plants) do you need if everyone on average generates more than they need from solar alone?
If you believe a guy who's been predicting things for decades based on S curves of tech adoption and disruption
Someone clue me in to how I can advocate for vpp trials in Oklahoma. And the utility tunnels from boring co. We have downed power lines due to ice and wind (not to mention tornadoes) all the time. And I'll hope someday I am eligible for one of the government programs that pay me to setup solar. What would the above headlines read like if 80% of homes in the afflicted areas had powerwalls and solar? "Fossil fuel plants deemed useless, powering down" perhaps?
The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what you want. -- D. Cohen
