Comment Re: Barn Door (Score 1) 165
At least you can define what the word "bioweapon" means, which means that you can, in principle, create a treaty to ban them. (Admittedly, the existing international treaty is unenforced and probably unenforceable).
No one can define what the words "artificial superintelligence" mean.
Comment Re:Depends on who you are I guess (Score 1) 208
Comment Re:Downloading felt very scammy (Score 1) 31
Comment Downloading felt very scammy (Score 2) 31
Comment Re:Different world (Score 1) 269
Comment In the current context... (Score 1) 19
Comment Re:Hypocrisy at it's finest. (Score 1) 233
Comment Re:We've made it through worse (Score 1, Informative) 233
Comment Re:We need to flush all activist judges (Score 4, Funny) 43
Comment Re:Are you sure that's wise? (Score 3, Interesting) 280
Comment Re:5X gravity? (Score 1) 22
LHS 1140b has 5x the mass, but only about 2.4x the surface gravity (since the surface is further away from the center of the planet's mass). Which is still enough to make life difficult for large animals, of course.
But even if the gravity was 5g, you could get a lot bigger than bacteria. Regular mice from Earth can survive in 7G environments for months at a time. Bacteria apparently can survive hundreds of thousands of Gs.
Comment Re:Way too much space junk (Score 1) 27
Comment Re:This is not a new problem (Score 1) 132
Fair point, I should have specified "the professors and the administrators" need to do their jobs, not just the professors.
I also get it that colleges "need customers", but... two of the universities mentioned in TFA are Brown and Princeton. Both Ivy League, both top-10 in the US, both with applicant acceptance rates of 5% or less. These universities are NOT going to run out of potential students if they start cracking down and enforcing standards. In fact, if they start cracking down and if they're very public about the crackdown, this will help their reputation immensely, and will make them more attractive to prospective students (at least the ones who don't plan to cheat).
Comment This is not a new problem (Score 1) 132
Long before LLMs, students would find ways to cheat on assignments-- either by hiring someone to write their papers for them, or by simple plagiarism. The penalty, if you were caught, was that you flunked the course with no appeal. The penalty for repeat offenders was that you got expelled.
The only difference here is that these students aren't getting appropriately penalized. These professors need to grow a pair and do their jobs, instead of rambling on thoughtfully about "best practices".