Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Note for world domination: encrypt serial no.'s (Score 2, Interesting) 330

I am implementing this at my factory. In fact, tanks c4ca4238a0b923820dcc509a6f75849b, c81e728d9d4c2f636f067f89cc14862c, eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3, a87ff679a2f3e71d9181a67b7542122c, and e4da3b7fbbce2345d7772b0674a318d5 just rolled off of the the assembly line.

You should at least use some salt if you just use md5 on those serial numbers... I could decode your serial numbers just by using publicly available reverse md5 lookup table...

Comment Google Tera Corpus (Score 1) 314

grep "^there is no " 4gm-0120 | sort -nr -k5 | head -n20
there is no need 1047859
there is no way 949479
there is no reason 648338
there is no such 577050
there is no evidence 536500
there is no 456920
there is no doubt 370217
there is no other 366274
there is no one 295448
there is no guarantee 245466
there is no " 227625
there is no real 179372
there is no difference 175348
there is no more 174525
there is no question 169013
there is no longer 160167
there is no point 145273
there is no better 142573
there is no problem 131840
there is no clear 126678

according to Google Tera Corpus...


Comment Re:Diaspora (Score 2, Interesting) 451

I've been thinking of something along this very line, but I'm a little torn: distributed is the right way to go, but to implement something akin to the facebook newsfeed, it seems like the right answer is an atom feed that all your friends subscribe to (and you to theirs), but then either you have something downloading theirs all the time, and then your info is stored on someone else's computer where it's easy pickings for a bot (and the opportunities for exposure multiplied), or you wait to fetch all 100+ friends' feeds. I'm not sure if the risk of the former is *that* big, after all, it wouldn't be hard for a bot to get the facebook login and skim all the info, but it would be rather harder than just picking off the local cache.

Building an distributed network on top of HTTP protocols (atom) will lead to privacy problems... It seems necessary to have a server-side support that will also implement some privacy policies which would allow you to define who gets access to which post. Also, the only way to get real time updates is by some polling, which may be resource intensive...

Using XMPP (Jabber) as a base for some kind of distributed social network seems to me like a better idea to me... It is still distributed, you can run your own server that will host your posts and will push all the updates to those subscribed, implement some privacy rules...

There is already a project that tries to do something like that: http://onesocialweb.org/

Comment Re:Standardize? (Score 1) 451

Will it eventually be possible to have a social-networking standard so that anyone can run their own server, just as with email? In that case it wouldn't matter if one friend uses facebook, another myspace, a third linkedin; they would all adhere to the same standard and so which particular social-networking service you use would become irrelevant.

It is possible and it is already happening... http://onesocialweb.org/ tries to build open social network protocol on top of XMPP...

Slashdot Top Deals

What is worth doing is worth the trouble of asking somebody to do.