Read the license again.
You may copy and/or distribute This Product, provided that You do not modify This Product (for terms and conditions for copying and distribution of modified versions of This Product, see Chapter III) and provided that You do not include This Product in another product forming Your Product (except as permitted under Chapter III)
Truecrypt is not free software and security problems have been noted in the past. Only free software should be trusted.
"Bundling" is a lie. OEM manipulation and technical sabotage are the truth. Calling Mozilla a "Monopoly" is just plain stupid.
According to Heather Bellini, of UBS AB and the top-ranked software analyst by Institutional Investor magazine all five M$ divisions were behind expectations and most are losers.
every one of Microsoft's five divisions may miss the company's and analysts' sales forecasts. The world's biggest software maker won't be able to cut enough costs to meet profit goals
Things have only gotten worse, which is why Oppenheimer & Co's analyst Brad Reback advises 10% cuts and others as much as 17%. None of that can save Vista, Zune, IE and other failures.
When the Wall Street Journal reports it, you know M$ is in trouble. EWeek also has an interesting write up with more technical details.
IBM joined forces with Virtual Bridges and Canonical Dec. 4 to offer a virtual desktop package comprises three software components that sit on one corporate server. The bundle, billed as "Microsoft free," is then provisioned to hundreds or even thousands of desktops.
Everyone and their dog is reporting this. IBM is basically dancing on Vista's grave by promissing cheaper and more flexible solutions. Existing hardware can be used, Windows is virtualized to run legacy apps but the real works is concentrated for greater reliability and easier upkeep. People at the Wall Street Journal concentrate on costs and claim savings of $500 to $800 per desktop per year. Eweek has lots of technical details. Others seem to follow these leads.
It looks like IBM is ready to capitalize on it's GNU/Linux work in a big way.
Companies making these deals don't own the land the lines run through and are obligated to be good stewards of it. This is the basis for telco regulation, to define what a good steward is. Cutting off large chunks of the internet is harmful to the public and should be avoided with reasonable regulations. Companies that violate those regulations can and should be replaced by the public with another that will maintain infrastructure better.
Ballmer tried to counter Vista's reputation as a mistake and failure. CBS did not miss this.
Both Gates and Ballmer were asked about the success, or lack thereof, of Windows Vista, with Walt Mossberg asking if Vista was a failure or a mistake.
"It's not a failure and not a mistake," responded Ballmer. "With 20/20 hindsight, there are things we would do differently." Ballmer said Vista has sold 150 million units so far, but he did say that business customers will be able to request a "downgrade" to Windows XP after the company stops selling XP in June - obviously a response to the fact that many customers prefer XP to Vista.
The Register has an article that focuses on this and what it means.
I agree with Gates, Win95 was as good as Windows got. No, I'm not Bill Gate's sockpupet. Their vision of a unified desktop and web browser has been better implemented by KDE since. XP's copy protection and Vista's digital restrictions were tremendous mistakes. The seeds of M$'s demise were expressed early on.
Who can afford to do professional work for nothing? What hobbyist can put 3-man years into programming, finding all bugs, documenting his product and distribute for free? The fact is, no one besides us has invested a lot of money in hobby software.
Free software has done all of these things better than non free software.
"What the scientists have in their briefcases is terrifying." -- Nikita Khrushchev