Comment Re:No---Hiibel (Score 1) 1568
It appears that the june 21, 2004 ruling only
applies to verbally identifying yourself.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl ?c ourt=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=03-5554
the Nevada Supreme Court has interpreted NRS 171.123(3) to require only that a suspect disclose his name. See 118 Nev., at ___, 59 P. 3d, at 1206 (opinion of Young, C. J.) ("The suspect is not required to provide private details about his background, but merely to state his name to an officer when reasonable suspicion exists"). As we understand it, the statute does not require a suspect to give the officer a driver's license or any other document.
applies to verbally identifying yourself.
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.p
the Nevada Supreme Court has interpreted NRS 171.123(3) to require only that a suspect disclose his name. See 118 Nev., at ___, 59 P. 3d, at 1206 (opinion of Young, C. J.) ("The suspect is not required to provide private details about his background, but merely to state his name to an officer when reasonable suspicion exists"). As we understand it, the statute does not require a suspect to give the officer a driver's license or any other document.
