The ignorance of their own religion among evolutionists never ceases to amaze. For a long time now honest evolutionists have said habillus was a dishonest taxom, just assorted bones of southern apes. Erectus was fully human . ", Wood and Collard have even suggested that the species rudolfensis (exemplified by cranium KNM-ER 1470) and habilis (exemplified by cranium KNM-ER 1813) be transferred from the genus Homo to Australopithecus " Wood, B. and Collard, M., The changing face of genus Homo, Evolutionary Anthropology 8:204, 1999 All we find is that humans have always been humans and apes ,apes. Same with cats and dogs, ask your local vet , there are greart variations but the only apeman was Piltdown .

That is nonsense you made up out of thin air. There are people from all walks of life there , from trash collectors to nuclear physicist. Just like the author of this silly post and liberals in general, you don't wish to be confused by the facts so you just make up stories , in other words you just lie to bolster your case. Why not go to spme meetings? I was with the tea party for since they first came to my town until I decided to go with the Constitution Party and have never heard the subject you claim is almost a single issue of the Tea Party ever discussed. I would say there is less than 3 percent of the total membership that earns the fiqures you claim and I personally never met a single doctor or dentist there. I met at least one leftist at each meeting trying to get a negative reaction, they were killed with kindness. Most just quit coming but a few were actually not completely brain dead and realized they had been lied to, given a very false impression of those people and decided to switch sides.

No, evolution is an ancient anti-God religion we know has existed since at least around 600 B.C. when the Greek merchant Thaas brought it to Asia Minor and opened the Ionian school. All the pagans believed it , the Epicureans of the Ionian school {atheist} , produced a poet named Lucretious about 100 B.C. that Errasmus Darwin emulated. There is no branch of science ever founded by an evolutionist and no field of science that anti-evolutionists do not excell at. If there was a single word of truth in your claims then only evolutionists could do science . Give me an example of a branch like that or admit you are an emotional , hyper religiousd fruitcake that lies even to yourself to avoid facing the truth that nothing creates itself as it would then have pre-existed itself, a logical impossibility. Evolutionists arte the least informed people on the planet on the subject of evolution. I have yet to meet a single one who could explain how radiometric dating works , that knew evolutionary scientists had determined "Lucy" was an aboreal knuckle walking ape and could not have exer walked upright , or that an evolutionists Peter R. Grant and B. Rosemary Grant studied the finches known falsley as "Darwin's Finches" , for 30 years and discovered they ALL interbreed and therefore are just variations of the same species. Not only that but the changes in beak size is due to whether patterns and they go back and forth with no long term change whatsover. Yet most religious evolutionists still claim this is proof or Darwin's fairytales and either don't know or lie about the fact Darwin did not even know they were finches and other naturalists on the Beagle documented them and Darwin did not mention them for 5 years after the voyage. Of course you all bought Piltdown Man and Piltdown Bird and Haeckles drawings are still in many so-called science books 145 years after Haeckle admitted they were frauds. And you still think you are intellectually superior ? Gullible beyond all imagination is more like it. I am not a follower of I.D. but I can see you are terrified to let students compare all the views and decide truth for themselves as it would be the end of evolution. It has to be rammed down peoples throats becasuse it defies logic and common sense,

If this had anything to do with science the the juvenile animosity you have against Christians would not exist, you just would not care. Somewhere inside you know there is a God but to consciously acknowledge His existence would bring the reality that He owns you and He makes the rules. Good thing you are the fringe minority.

The theory and the law of gravity , they both exist, were based on the Christian idea of experimental science. There is irrefutable evidence that there is a force we choose to call gravity , it can be tested by scientist independently and the results are always the same . Evolution is a belief, there is no irrefutable evidence it ever happened {one animal evolving into something different such as a one celled animal to a two , amphibian to reptile, reptile to bird etc.} and there is no possible way to test this belief. To compare the theory of gravity , the brainchild of Issac Newton , a full time theologian and part time scientist makes no sense. Newton wrote more than twice as much about theology as science and held evolution as a stupid and dangerous joke masquerading as science. He ridiculed atheists who believed in it openly including one he kept telling that his model of the solar system evolved over millions of years just to get a rise out of him, make him think. To use this great man of God who conducted real science and who despised and ridiculed the idea of evolution to show that Christians are stupid and anti-science says a whole lot more about you than us. Name any branch of science evolutionists founded , name a major invention, even atheist philosophers of science understand that science could have never prospered without the belief in an orderly creator God.

A person who honestly believes truth does not exist is criminally insane and should be restrained for life. Pushing an innocent old person in front of a bus or setting fire to house while the residents sleep is wrong , that will always be true. The reason that people like the idea that truth does not exist it they think it frees them from moral obligation. Patriotism is not bigotry , godless communism , the end goal of socialism is. To make war on a country because you don't like the way they live is bigotry , America is the only reason there is a free world. If you think patriotism is bigotry I suggest you move because when it comes time to choose you have to be willing to die for your beliefs and make sure your enemy dies for his. People with the attitude you have exposed are cowards who prefer slavery to death.

The dinosaurs are always found in sedimentary rock proving they drowned in a flood. To claim the fossils formed over millions of years is beyond stupid , they would have rotted and been bestroyed by scavengers and insects. We find them often in ripped apart in huge piles along with marine , aquatic {fresh water) , terrestrial and avion life which tells us they died elsewhere and were transported there by water. We have very reliable histories of them existing in the last few hundred years. Some small to medium lizards and several flying reptiles. The Bibles tells of people training them to pull carts and the Chinese who use the same word for dragon and dinosaur have histories of emperors who used them to pupp carts. Alexander the Great dealt with some worshipped as gods in India. Fossils evidence does not speak and the historical evidence that man existed with dinosaurs is vast. Most dinosaurs were rather small, the size of a sheep is average. The giants like T-Rex we know little about, we have only found a few of them so how many existed is anyone's guess. The stupid argument "No man has seen a living dinosaur" is mindless, how could you know? We have many accounts where men said they did and in some cases the they knew details such as skin color we just recently found out, how did they know? Easy, they saw them! The depiction of a Stegasauras on a 1500 year old temple in Thailand is exact as are ones from Meso-America. The American Indians depiction of giant saurapods and duckbills are proof enough for anyone with an open mind they saw these creatures. We find unfossilized dinosaur bones all the time , some with red blood cells , soft and stretchy flesh that stinks of death. We have found thousands of creatures from fish to insects to trees that supposedly died off more than 65 million years ago alive and well . It is you who refuses to accept the evidence . When you feel evidence from the past supports your religious beliefs you claim it as absolute fact and that anyone who disagres is stupid. When it tends to disagree such as finding human bones in the same rock as dinosaurs you make up stories such as it must have been a reburiaal even though you have nothing but your religious beliefs to supprt the idea. Evolution is the never ending story, every generation has to get a whole new set of "facts" because the previous "facts " are now extinct. And to top it off you are so ignorant of science you cannot tell me the most basic rules such as what the assumptions required to estimate the age of a rock are or even how many are required , yet you think that your ignorance is superior intellrct? Get a grip!

46% of Americans accept the scientific fact that spontaneous generation is religious nonsense and that matter cannot create intelligence. 46% of American are not so easily fooled by the fairy tale that magically the first self repicating organism created itself. 46% of Americans have a better argument from science than name calling . Evolutionists cannot name the assumptions necessary to estimate {theoretically} the age of a rock yet call those who have forgotten more about the science involved than they will ever know stupid. 46% of Americans would not call the men who gave us physics, genetics, calculus, plate tectonics, physics. invented the microscope, the printing press,the telescope , the airplane, modern medicine,biology,internal combustion, computers , Morse Code , etc. ,the man who got us to the moon , the father of modern rocketry ,the world's foremost geophysicist etc.etc.etc. stupid and those that found out how stars form from men from Uranus and Neprune at a seance brilliant.

Yes there are people so stupid they still believe in spontaneous generation and transmutation and lack the fainest clue as to how Information Theory works. They are so blinded by their religious beliefs they just assume something as incredibly specifically complex as a self replicating organism arose by itself from matter. It was "JUST THERE" . Then they imagine that copying mistakes write previously non-existant code that produces features likes livers, lungs, and eyeballs that never before existed in the biosphere and reject science which knows of only one source of information, an intelligent mind. They accept the teachings of the lawyer Charles Lyell who was described by world famous geologist like Steven J. Gould and Derrick Ager {both Marxist/Atheist/Evolutionists} as a con-man {Goulds Words} who BRAINWASHED {Agers Words} ALL secular scientists for 150 years as absolute fact. To top it off that worship Charles Darwin despite the fact modern geologists have disproved all his nonsense about the Santa Cruz River and proven that all Galopagos finches interbreed and their beak sizes vary back and forth with weather patterns. They claim that "dating" rocks proves the earth is billions of years old yet cannot tell you what assumptions are required to "date" rocks or why in every case when we knew the age certain rocks formed they were "dated" as tens to billions of times older than we observe . Despite the fact we have witnesses rocks form in a few months and stalagtites and stalagmites form in less than 10 years they still claim these things PROVE millions of years. Yes there are a lot of stupid people .

That is simply nonsense, a virus is non life . Science does not draw lines, scientist do, and those who practice the religion of naturalism love to try and intimidate their students into believing that all scientists believe in evolution and reject the bible. Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. "Viruses have none of the characteristics of life—they do not grow, they lack cells, and they come only in standard models with few, if any, variations of standard parts. They lack most of the cell enzymes and organelles needed to live, and consequently must exploit their host’s organelles. For this reason, viruses are called obligate intracellular parasites, and are ‘infectious particles’ rather than organisms. The complete infectious unit is called a virion. The few enzymes they possess (such as integrase) are usually related to the mechanisms they use to enter their host cell. They are usually only able to multiply in their specific host, and often in only a specific organ within the host (such as the liver). All members of one viral type are usually almost identical in every way except for the glycoprotein antigens on their protein coat.13 It is this signal that can trigger an immune system response in a host." Jerry Bergman has taught biology, genetics, chemistry, biochemistry, anthropology, geology, and microbiology , he has 98 degrees and will soon complete number 9.