It looks like Anonymous has republished the photo and has tweeted that they are a gift to the Egyptian People. You can see the photos here: http://www.pdf-archive.com/2011/03/13/egyptofficers-rev-840/egyptofficers-rev-840.pdf and Anonymous' tweet on the subject here: http://twitter.com/#!/Anony_Ops/status/46799870304071680

If my warranty scam was not perpetrating fraud and was just a simple auto warranty robocall, exemplitying neither force nor fraud could I as a California business blast the hell out of millions of California homes with a robodial?

except that she called me on my cell phone. on a Sunday afternoon during my son's baseball game.

I have no idea how the Libertarian party feels about robo calls. But me personally, I hate them. The Libertarian party best represents most of my major politica views though.

could I robodial all California voters with a warranty scam? Would that be legal under the California law?

I was the one that Kolakowski robodialed. I am not an "established business associate, customer, or other person having an established relationship with" her, therefore this exception would not apply to her. If you want to try and argue that the same political party would constitute an "established" relationship (which is a total stretch) then in order to be of my same party, Kolakowski would have to be a registered Libertarian like I am. I doubt she is. But here again, if political party affiliation was enough, then couldn't someone who was a Democrat simply robodial all of the Democrats in California with an unsavory auto warranty scam phone call? As I read this law there is no wiggle room at all. She is breaking the law and she should admit it, apologize and pledge not to use robodialers in the state of California in the future. If she'd like to use them then she needs to work to change the laws in the State to allow them, rather then simply ignore a law that she doesn't like or that is inconvenient for her. But even if she can find some wiggle room or some minor technicality to skate by the intent of this law, certainly the ethical thing for a candidate for judge to do would be to abide by the spirit of the law which is to stop these annoying and harassing cals in the State of California.

No shit, Sherlock.

There's this funny thing called a "double entendre" where you try to describe a situation in an ambiguous way, often as part of something else called a "joke."

... On second thought, there is simply no way you can be serious.

Kirk topless for no reason in the blink of an eye? They REALLY ARE staying true to the original!