It's interesting how expectations of privacy can change over time with the technology. I'm pretty sure that before cell phones you couldn't get a land-line installed without the phone company having all your details - especially a physical address - that the government could get pretty easily from them. But then you also had pay phones in many places, which were the old timey version of a burner. Bring back phone booths! lol

At this point I view every announcement from any Ai company about how amazing/scary/advanced/ their product is to be 90%+ marketing. They are constantly trying to make everyone believe their own BS hype, because it's the only thing that can keep the gravy train rolling longer.

This was my exact thought - "and take action without needing to be prompted each time" is a huge no for me. I imagine they wanted to keep the naming scheme consistent with their current "Copilot", which is a much more palatable offering, because it doesn't act without you telling it to.

Maybe this is why Dell's enterprise customer service, tech support, and repair service for end-user PCs have rapidly gone down hill in the last two years. Like nVidia, they don't see this previously core component as a big money-make anymorer. It's really gotten abysmal, even for a company that buys thousands of systems from them annually. You can see the cost-cutting measures in every interaction now, as well as the huge price hikes due to component shortages. Ai is destroying the tech industry in more ways than one.

There's no way this ends up happening because it would be a wonderful thing for our rights, and 'murica doesn't do that kind of thing any more.

At this point, as long as Steam and GOG stay up and running with their current catalogs, the entire video game development industry could self-destruct and any gamer over 30 would have enough stuff to play until they die. The younger generation of players would have time to create a new industry from scratch for themselves :)

Ahh well, good for this guy at least. I wonder if he'll actually name his kid Claude as he said in his post.

They still get a decent number of kids online but also get plausible deniability. Once you've required users to lie or cheat to bypass your "safeguards" you are no longer liable for any harm, right?

OMG can you imagine driving in a stressful or bad weather situation and having a constant animation playing on your car's fricking hood? Most idiot drivers can barely pay attention as it is. Next up - play Mario Bros on your car's hood in traffic!

"supported the idea in principle but would not block a major redevelopment project tied to jobs and local investment" translation: "I agree with the idea, unless they pay us enough money to ignore the problems, just like every other giant business investment."

It seems like there's a pretty easy solution to this problem, but maybe I'm missing some key info, since I'm looking at it from the outside.. 1) Don't allow uploads from any account less than a week old. 2) Anyone caught uploading an Ai track has their account warned on the first offense, banned for the second one. This incudes any payment details they gave to collect money for their garbage. 3) Cut the number of uploads an account can make to what a human artist could "reasonably" produce in a week. I leave it to the musicians at Deezer to determine that number. Make it a growing scale based on account age. The newer you are, the fewer tracks you can upload. This should make it just hard enough to keep setting up new accounts, that the minimal amount they stand to make from trying won't be worth it. It won't be 100% but it seems like it would cut down enormously on the amount.

I'm not nearly as worried about the NSA and Mythos as I am about what Trump's sycophants will do with it to mess with the upcoming elections, the Dem's email systems, and to trap and frame his political "enemies".

My friends and I saw Project Hail Mary in one of these types of theaters. The image was great and the screen was big, so that was nice. But theaters seem to be cheaping-out on sound systems now, relying on volume and bass to make up for a lack of speaker numbers and quality. I was not impressed in that regard.

Security through obscurity will usually delay hackers, the trick is doing it long enough to keep ahead of them. But would relying on an LLM to find all your weak spots in a meaningful way require subscriptions to every one of them, at their highest tiers? You have to find every problem that any one of them might spot. Otherwise you're still open to that one hacker who used that one tool that you didn't. I really wonder how much work and cost will be associated with maintaining open source code in a world where foreign governments and solo black hats have access to 100 different specially trained LLMs, including ones you simply can't get for various reasons.

Do theaters still get 0% of the box office and rely solely on ad revenue and dwindling sales of overpriced concessions for all their income? If so, it's easy for this kind of greedy idiot to complain about it, but ultimately meaningless.