evolution is as proven as ID, why not teach both? (Score 1)

i hear screams of "ID isn't science, these theories must be test and proven to be science". evolution is as tested and proven as ID is. we don't have evidence, look around you, we don't see animals or plants in the middle of a species transformation, (evolving from one species to another). there is ADAPTATION, but not evolution. we don't have *proof* that everything alive today evolved form simple organisms into the vast, complex organisms we have today. so, when it comes down to it, evolution is as scientific fact as ID. they are both a belief in something that we can never prove, because we weren't there. faith has been called "believing in the unseen", so if you use that definition, you would consider both evolution and ID as "faith" based theories, so why would it be ok to teach one in the classroom and not the other?