Well, a Soros-linked company from the UK is supplying 16 States with voting hardware this year. Will there be a comparable amount of suspicion?
Why couldn't the hacker be working for the American people who deserve to have the information about the candidates before the election?
I remember when the systemd monster was released into the linux ecosystem, many people screamed that giving a single piece of code so much responsibility was dangerous and it went against the "software should do one thing well".
We reap what we sow.
So in other words, it is fine for a gender to be over represented in an industry as long as that overrepresentation is reflected in the applicants. Further to that, could it then be seen as discrimination against a gender when the government promotes industries for the opposite gender? (an example, more women in IT)
Correct, it is at the payment page that is switches to ubuntu.com.
Progressing through the site in order to download, eventually takes you to the official ubuntu.com site. Though the step prior is a "donation" page, so it appears they just want the money.
I am a computer. I am dumber than any human and smarter than any administrator.