| Subject | Datestamp | Replies | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Re:Blind music critics? | ||||||
| attached to iTunes Uncovers Musical Hoax | ||||||
| Re:128k is 128k and is marginal at best. | ||||||
| attached to Are iTMS's 128kbps Songs Worth Collecting? | ||||||
| more technical and less subjective != better | ||||||
| Tested atrac3, not atrac3plus | ||||||
| attached to New Walkman-Branded Hard Disk Player | ||||||
| Re:Innovating with other codecs | ||||||
| Re:The tests are blind. | ||||||
| Re:FLAC? | ||||||
| Re:Meaningless? | ||||||
| Re:No HE AAC? | ||||||
| attached to Vorbis And Musepack Win 128kbps Multiformat Test | ||||||
| Re:have you taken the test? | ||||||
| attached to 2nd Multi-Format 128kbps Public Listening Test | ||||||
| Re:Error bars | ||||||
| Re:Don't use ANOVA here | ||||||
| Re:Error bars | ||||||
| attached to Latest AAC Encoder Comparison Results | ||||||
| Re:Not unbiased, but... | ||||||
| Re:An interesting intepretation | ||||||
| Re:I'll sum up the tests for you... | ||||||
| Re:Digital Music artist perspective | ||||||
| attached to Listening Comparisons For Audio Codecs At 64kbps | ||||||
| Re:Clear Winner? | ||||||
| Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong | ||||||
| Re:Wait. | ||||||
| attached to Hydrogenaudio AAC Listening Test Results | ||||||
| Re:Test compares codecs, not formats | ||||||
| Re:Ranking? | ||||||
| Re:No Control | ||||||
| attached to Audio Format Listening Tests Concluded | ||||||
| Re:Double Blind Listening Tests... Where ??? | ||||||
| attached to Ogg Vorbis RC3 Released | ||||||
Anything free is worth what you pay for it.
