Comment Re:Archaeology (Score 1) 200
Wrong...
That's Real Science doing Evaluation (an inter-disciplinary one as any true science should be)...
... with all the bias that Real Science has, still is the best tool.
However we do not have all the facts.
What is not... is Egyptology (if you get the meaning)...
Remind you of the *imagined* Pré-History (according with ignorant XIX century historians who "invented" incongruent "ages" of stone and metal... with all the paradoxes associated. Its was "invented" by those "historians", just academics in the lowest sense. The very same that denied Schlieman's aptitude as a better historian, not even after the discovery of the city of Troy. Still they ruled and the "history" we have is based on them.
Note: You can find a little memo in my site under "papers" ... it's a very old small comment in a very incomplete section ... Yo'll have to use google translation (but be aware that the translation is terrible due to the family language differences).
Fact is:
The world are full of OPAs (Out-of-Place-Artifacts) that are hidden in museum caves just for the sin of breaking the prevalent historians dogma. (that's why "history" is still NOT a science,.. sometimes it USES technological methods offered by science... but only when it is convenient to do so.) ... This one, if correct is just a minor one that was not covered. Thanks to honest people... away from the prevalent academic politics.
There are still reports in ancient literature that the continuation of the Roman Empire (the church) did not destroyed. Take the Vedas for instance. Tank God some things survived... But will they?!? Defying established dogmas is very dangerous: Take 911 as an example... Or the fire of the Reichtag that give full power to the Hister and the gang behind him. History does repeat... and in ALL senses.
DuLac, http://www.factor-h.com/
However we do not have all the facts.
What is not... is Egyptology (if you get the meaning)...
Remind you of the *imagined* Pré-History (according with ignorant XIX century historians who "invented" incongruent "ages" of stone and metal... with all the paradoxes associated. Its was "invented" by those "historians", just academics in the lowest sense. The very same that denied Schlieman's aptitude as a better historian, not even after the discovery of the city of Troy. Still they ruled and the "history" we have is based on them.
Note: You can find a little memo in my site under "papers"
Fact is:
The world are full of OPAs (Out-of-Place-Artifacts) that are hidden in museum caves just for the sin of breaking the prevalent historians dogma. (that's why "history" is still NOT a science,.. sometimes it USES technological methods offered by science... but only when it is convenient to do so.)
There are still reports in ancient literature that the continuation of the Roman Empire (the church) did not destroyed. Take the Vedas for instance. Tank God some things survived... But will they?!? Defying established dogmas is very dangerous: Take 911 as an example... Or the fire of the Reichtag that give full power to the Hister and the gang behind him. History does repeat... and in ALL senses.
DuLac, http://www.factor-h.com/
