Comment Re:Questioning the constitutionality... (Score 0) 247
this seems oddly reminiscent of the stupid "birther" arguments.
The man said he approved the bill; do we really need to question if he approved it? When he signs a bill in the white house, he uses a bunch of different pens -- the start-and-stop nature of the process, the difference in inks and tips, all would wreak havoc for the cryptanalysis's (can't believe that word is in spell check) too. Should we question that? No one actually looks over his shoulder -- maybe he isn't signing HIS name? Maybe he already signed a copy that will be produced "for the record"?