Re:What's to accept? (Score 1)

As I already mentioned, I don't think that Google is an illegal monopoly, and I rather like the company, like practically all the commenters here. But suppose there just isn't another way to make a good search engine except the way google do, and suppose (I don't know whether it's true) that the search method is patented. Does the fact that google founders were clever enough to come up with their search method give them an unlimited control of it? What would you say if it were an AIDS vaccine? The reason I decided to mention my point was that all the comments were so pro-google that I wanted to note that although they are currently doing good does not mean we should not consider what would happen if they turned evil.