exclusive_lock - Slashdot User

Novell, Dell Face Delisting From NASDAQ 77

Posted by kdawson on Thursday September 21, 2006 @11:37AM

narramissic writes to tell us that Novell has confirmed receiving a delisting notice from the NASDAQ stock exchange, after the software company delayed filing its most recent quarterly report to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Dell is in the same position. Both companies, and others including Apple, are grappling with investigations of the way they issued stock options and — in Dell's case — other accounting irregularities. Both companies are appealing the delisting, which means they won't vanish from the stock exchange anytime soon. NASDAQ rules require listed companies to announce the receipt of a delisting notice.

Space On a Shoestring 257

Posted by kdawson on Wednesday September 20, 2006 @12:18AM from the hey-gang-let's-build-a-rocketship dept.

An anonymous reader writes, "Three engineering students from Cambridge University plan to send an unmanned craft into space for £1,000 ($1,880) and have just sent a test mission up 32 km for a lot less. Their snaps from the upper atmosphere are impressive, and were taken by a balloon equipped with off-the-shelf technology including GSM text messaging, radio communications, and an ordinary 5-megapixel camera. They now plan to use a similar craft as a launching stage to get a cheap rocket into space." There's also a video of the balloon launch.

Comment Re:interesting (Score 3, Funny) 205

by exclusive_lock on Monday September 11, 2006 @12:11PM (#16081633) Attached to: MS06-049 Causing Silent Data Corruption

As the late Steve Irwin would say: "CRIKEY!".
You're right, I should've known that venomous EULA would turn right back and bite me (and all Microsoft customers) in the rear.

"Satisfaction Guaranteed!"*

* The term "Satisfaction" and "Guaranteed" are used only for illustration purpouses in a figurative, subliminal manner.
Enlarged to show texture. Serving suggestion.
As a matter of fact, no satisfaction guaranteed whatsoever, by any means.
Reading the words "satisfaction" and "guaranteed" above certifies you accept this disclaimer, its terminology, grammar and syntax errors as the single source of truth given to us by the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
By the way, why are you reading down here? Our legal department wants to know who reads this stuff (and sue them).
Don't bother to ask "Who is it?" the next time someone knocks at your door, it's them.

Congress vs Misleading Meta Tags 473

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wednesday July 26, 2006 @09:12AM from the oh-this'll-work-really-well dept.

Krishna Dagli writes "The U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday approved a bill that would make it a federal felony for Webmasters to use innocent words like "Barbie" or "Furby" but actually feature sexual content on their sites. Anyone who includes misleading "words" or "images" intended to confuse a minor into viewing a possibly harmful Web site could be imprisoned for up to 20 years and fined, the bill says." Terrible news for the Barbie/Furbie fetishists out there, to say nothing about being completely impossible to enforce globally.

Jakob Nielsen on Design, RSS, Email, and Blogs 161

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wednesday June 21, 2006 @12:53PM from the where-do-we-go-from-here dept.

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "Jakob Nielsen took some time to chat with the Wall Street Journal's Lee Gomes about RSS, email newsletters, web design and blogs. When asked whether blogs must maintain a 'conversation' with readers, Nielsen says, 'That will work only for the people who are most fanatic, who are engaged so much that they will go and check out these blogs all the time. There are definitely some people who do that -- they are a small fraction. A much larger part of the population is not into that so much. The Internet is not that important to them. It's a support tool for them. Bloggers tend to be all one extreme edge. It's really dangerous to design for a technical elite. We have to design for a broad majority of users.'"

Slashdot Top Deals