
I'd put this to you - if civilians understood that they would get killed in wars too, they might be a lot less likely to build, finance and cheer on the armies to fight them.
Actually, aren't armies supposed to defend countries and the civilian population? By your reasoning, American citizens should stop supporting their own army, as they may get killed in the even of a war. Fortunately for you, there has been no war on US soil for more than a century.
And yes, there are rules in war. They are international law. They are made to protect civilians and human rights as a whole, in all situations. If you don't like them it may be because you are on the winning side, and you don't suffer the massacres.
I'm sure the handset makers are deeply saddened by this. Clearly, this unwelcome meddling by government will hurt consumers by ending competition in this vital technical matter.
Vital techinical matter? It's just the charger. They could use additional ports if they want to. And it may be financially wise for the companies: they will charge you the same for the phone, and they won't have to give you another charger. I guess not that many people loose their chargers and have to buy additional units.
This could cost consumers literally incalculable amounts of synergy and innovation. Why won't the government just let capitalism work?
Mixing capitalism with a "standard" charge port doesn't make any sense. And I don't see any great amount of innovation coming from the charge port.
Save yourself! Reboot in 5 seconds!