
I think it's more like you're the commanding officer of a silo who gets replaced, locks everything down and refuses to let your successor into the silo. Your successor would like to come in, perform maintenance, and prevent the thing from degrading and exploding, and you refuse to let them in.
As for competence
And honestly
I dunno. Remember that shoe bomber, Richard Reid? His bomb didn't go off. So
I think I'd have felt worse for Childs except that he just so clearly brought this on himself
To use your analogy, though, this is a soldier on guard that made up his own password and won't let anyone know what it is. Which is not particularly helpful when you have legitimate traffic that would like to pass through but can't because no one knows the password.
But frankly I don't think it's a particularly valid analogy.
It's great to be smart 'cause then you know stuff.