Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Finally a post worth logging in for... (Score 1) 292

I'm surprised no one has mentioned the obvious here. First of all, how many people have actually worked with any of those geniuses who know every technology under the sun? Now, how many people have worked with people so incompetent you can't imagine how they were ever hired and then despondent because those same people also hired you? It doesn't add up, does it? The interviews are designed to legally discriminate. They are used to turn candidates into rejects. There is no law that says people who are hired must have all of those skills. But anyone who doesn't have every skill is legally a candidate for rejection. This allows employers to hire according to race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, personal acquaintance, or just about any other criteria. That is the way the system works people.

Comment Re:Say "goodbye" to 64-bit builds of Opera... apk (Score 1) 92

I said nothing about Google being "evil". Google is just providing more value to its customers. Google most definitely does not want ads to be able to access the rest of your browser information. That information should only come from Google, properly anonymized and billed. While this change would make it harder for malicious iframes to sniff data that doesn't belong to them, it would also give malicious iframes more opportunities to inject code. Currently, if such an iframe tried that and failed, it will kill the parent process, effectively ending the injection attempts. With the new system, multiple iframes could keep trying different tactics.

Comment Typical haters (Score 5, Insightful) 52

Yep, they were sending login information over plain http.

The author of the original article was very careful with what he did and didn't say. He didn't say that Apple sent login information over plain http. And if you read the support document where Elie Bursztein gets his 15 seconds of Apple fame, you will see that Apple says the update now encrypts "active content". In short, login information was never sent over plain text.

Comment That's funny... (Score 0) 287

I didn't see anything on the JSTOR Alumni program page that said alumni had the right to hide their faces from security cameras, break into networking cabinets, jack into the gigabit ethernet switch, spoof their MAC address via a randomizer script, and bring down JSTOR access for their entire institution.

Comment What I don't understand (Score 1) 217

is why the mysterious Pamela Jones and the rest of the open-source community has identified Apple as The Great Satan. What has Apple ever done to hurt them? Complied with the GPL? OK. Guilty as charged. People who love their Apple devices get derided as fanbois. People who hate, without ever being harmed, are the good guys?

Comment True story (Score 1) 266

I had a report of problems with a web sites from users who may or may not have been using IE9. So, I fired up my Windows 7 VM to check and it was still running IE8. What? No problem. That is why I installed it this VM. I just searched for "ie9" in my IE8 browser. Bing couldn't find a download link for IE9. It was Google's top hit.

Comment Re:Patent system broken (Score 1) 1184

The patent system is designed to facilitate copying. It gives the patent holder a temporary, legal monopoly to encourage innovation. After the patent expires, it's fair game. The idea of patents is great, but everyone acknowledges the system needs reform. Maybe this case will make that happen. Would that be so bad?

Comment Re:R.I.P. Innovation (Score 1, Insightful) 1184

When it costs a small developer millions of dollars to patent search and licence obvious designs, we have killed innovation.

What we need is a company that stands up for small developers. Someone that frees them from credit card merchant companies. Someone that will go to court and defend small developers against patent trolls!

Oh wait. That's Apple.

Never mind.

Comment Re:How could they have gotten away with that claim (Score 3, Informative) 327

I think one of the reasons for the re-wording was to remove the word "viruses" since it so obviously confuses people who don't know the difference between viruses and trojans and think the handful of Mac malware in 12 years is equivalent to over 17,000,000 for Windows. Sorry, but market-share doesn't account for that discrepancy.

Slashdot Top Deals

No amount of careful planning will ever replace dumb luck.