This feature is already in the latest Canary build of Google Chrome.

If by compatibibility mode, you mean compatibility view, according to Microsoft it will "display the website as viewed in Internet Explorer 7", not ie6.

Yes, it didn't used to, but It's been working for me for awhile also, maybe a month. The gadget's iframe address uses https.

And atop of everything, there's internet. TCP/IP can't tell apart copyrighted data and non copyrighted data. That's it.

And very likely a genetic predisposition to suicide as well.

Yes, I used soulseek for some time. I've found there very interesting stuff, though not always with the expected quality. I still come back once in a while (at the old server), specially to find old stuff I cannot find in the scene -in both places I use another nick, just FYI.
I've also found and bought some vinyls in gemm, ebay, musicstack, cdandlp, at record fairs, music stores... I buy new music on a weekly basis, mainly at cdbaby, interpunk and straight from the labels/artists. And, finally, I dl on average 4500 mp3s per month.
To keep track of this huge amount of music I've made an application to rate, query and organize my own music.
All in all, there's still music I cannot obtain. But not only me: every person passionate about music I know has his own wanted list. As a slsk user, you should know it. And the records exists, and we have the technical means to make them available to everybody. If it's not happening it's because an obsolete industry it's keeping us from achieving it. They are not stopping people to share music, this is a fact. Instead, as a collateral damage, they are preventing the possibility to preserve and organize forever our musical heritage. The scene is doing an excellent job in that way, but, as long as it remains in the clandestine underground, very few people have access to it and, at the end, the rarest music get poorly disseminated and is not taking in any hard drive connected to a given network.
Maybe it's about time to start talking about the quality (tags, encoding...) of the music is circulating in the p2p networks, and not about the cds the major labels are not supposedly selling because of them. By the way, you don't measure the health of the actual music panorama on cds sales. Perhaps you could do it on musical instruments sales, but on cds sales? It's plain ridiculous.
Anyway... thanks for your reply, mate. :)

Not for me. Despite the 210k mp3s I have in my hard drives, the p2p networks, music streaming sites and online and traditional music stores, I have lists of hundreds of albums I cannot find anywhere.
Not only that, part of the music I own* doesn't meet what I consider a minimum of quality. But I cannot obtain it with a better encoding.
Music is a form of art and, as such, it should be considered, if not a patrimony of the humanity, at least something culturally valuable.
So it is significant how you store the data, how you rip, encode, tag and sort the music, in order to make it accessible and preserve its quality.

* I can manipulate it, delete it and listen to it whenever and wherever I want.

At least in w2k and xp, you have a run as... in your context menue

indeed. http://punxter.com/pic/Piracy_Up,_Global_Warming_Down

"The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable."