Prior art in humans.
Prior art in humans.
I attended a course by Yale Patt from U. Austin, who is one of the "popes" of Computer Architecture research (see this ranking, for example), where he discussed Moore's Law.
He argued how Moore's Law was not a physical law, nor a technological or market-driven law. But it was a real law and had a very large impact.
Instead, he argued very accurately that Moore's Law was actually a psychological Law: given that it provided the baseline for the expected performance (or transistor count) increase, every company would struggle to get to that point, knowing that otherwise the others would get it and make a much better product. Therefore, Moore's Law became somehow a self-fulfilled prophecy. Note how the ITRS still provides yearly predictions for the (still exponential, in some cases) improvements in semiconductor technology fabrication.
So definitely you are right in that it was a mere observation -- but this observation drove the evolution of electronics for more than 50 years (enough to be labelled as "Law", isn't it?)
It was the battery! Nothing to see here, move along...
Meanwhile, in the rest of the world they are aware of countdown traffic lights, which provide a much simpler solution to this problem.
So, since you do not trust Microsoft... Why do you use Win7 at all?
Most of us know THX as the logo that comes up when we hear that zooming sound at the start of a film...
Don't you see the problem with the current Slashdot? Summaries do not target nerds, or anyone minimally interested in technology. Some years ago, most of us would have known THX, many of us would have known the intricacies of multichannel digital sound encoding, and some of us would have indeed worked in the field, possibly in THX itself. Comments on the news would come in first person. But right know, news target a general audience, so there is not enough detail for people interested in the very details of the topics.
Any advice on alternatives to find news for nerds, with a good commenting and moderation system?
It can work over cat 5e for 2.5Gbps and over cat 6 for 5 Gbps. There is a nice description in the Wikipedia entry
This new standard is very interesting: it employs the same coding and spectral density as 10GBase-T (6.25 bps/Hz), but it employs the available bandwidth (Hz) depending on the cable category: Cat.5e (100 MHz) can provide 2.5Gbps and Cat.6 (250 MHz) can provide 5 Gbps.
Interestingly, before this standard there was no practical use for Cat.6 cabling: any speed you could obtain using Cat.6 cable (1Gbps) could be also obtained using cat.5e, and if you wanted something faster (10Gbps) you needed Cat. 6A (500 MHz BW). This newly ratified standard finally gets some use from those extra MHz you have in Cat. 6, if you have installed it. It will be interesting to know if 802.3bz ports will be able to measure link bandwidth to adapt speed accordingly to 2.5/5Gbps.
Thanks for the link! (no modpoints, sorry). It sounds similar to an POTS traditional phone to me, though.
Broadcast used to mean Broadcast in te olde Slashdot!
Rather than implementing a complex technology in every single car, there exist countries that have started to implement countdown traffic lights. I have found them while driving and understood it immediately without any explanation. Much simpler, really easy and intuitive, much cheaper globally. I do not understand the approach from Audi.
So... It's a bad thing for the Xbox that if you don't have a 4k TV set, you cannot enjoy 4k resolution... So bad for the Xbox...
(Who wrote such review?)
The parent is right.
But not only that. The flash controller could be running a background process, such as offline deduplication or data block movement for static wear levelling. These processes are *not* triggered by reads or writes from the OS, so even when you are not actively writing to the disk, simply removing it without ejecting *might* cause data corruption and data loss.
Please Slashdot editors,
Make summaries interesting for your target readers.
If you want to shift your target to people who, within the context of a wireless protocol, consider "advertisements" as something bad and intrusive and not some type of broadcast service announcement, that's ok. But please, in that case tell us clearly, so we can find an alternative site.
If you want to recover the old nerdies who have long left the page, please consider that your audience has some technical background when writing the summaries. You could have highlighted many interesting points from the Ars Technica text (or even have found a deeper one), such as current size of advertising packets or the discussion on hardware compatibility via software upgrade.
But instead, you highlighted the only part which has no interest -- the clarification about what are *not* advertising packets. Seriously, is the focus of the summary targeting your target?
I doubt it. The binary could be unsigned, and the (fake) website provide some instructions on ignoring the UAC notification but validating the SHA-1 hash, which would be a sensible way to do when you do not have (or pay) a code signing certificate. More info, for example: http://www.excelsiorjet.com/kb...
Been Transferred Lately?