Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Numbers (Score 1) 575

However, there are people who may be flying somewhere for a funeral. They may absolutely have to be back at work the next day or face termination.

It sucks but in the situations you describe maybe the person shouldn't be flying. Its easy to get mad at the airline when someone is involuntarily bumped but it could have been a storm, or an accident at the airport, or one of many other unlikely but possible issues. If the cost of a delayed flight will cause you to risk loosing your job, or miss a wedding, funeral, or some other event maybe you should plan a day of contingency into your travel plans.

Comment Re:Mile high club (Score 1) 575

Except for buying the most expensive tickets, there's no option to buy a ticket where you won't be "voluntold" to leave the seat you're already in.

What other option would you like? If you want a cheap ticket be aware of the fact you might get bumped. If getting bumped isn't OK then buy a more expensive ticket. Ya a first class ticket costs a lot more but in addition to complimentary alcohol you are less likely to get bumped. If getting bumped is a big deal then the cost of the ticket probably isn't.

The other really important thing to remember is that as good as the industry generally is at getting people to their destination at about the time they say they will there is always the possibility that there will be some issue that prevents you from getting where you want to be when you want to be there. It could be weather, or mechanical, or airport shooting or... If you absolutely have to be somewhere on Monday morning you shouldn't be flying on the last flight out Sunday...

Comment Re:Works for Me (Score 1) 259

Also, if security loopholes are discovered and exploits made, and your software didn't change - then it did "degrade" because now it's not as secure as it once was.

I wouldn't say that its not as secure. Its just as secure, its just less safe because the exploits are known.

Comment Apple should pay like anyone else (Score 1) 286

Many companies offer cash bounties in exchange for security bugs. This means hackers can 'sell' their bugs to the manufacture who can then pass it. The hacker gets cash and they get to feel good about what they did; but mostly they get cash. I don't believe apple pays for bugs. If they did this the company might have 'sold' their bug to apple instead of the FBI and any agency/country wanting to access an IPhone.

Comment Precheck lanes always need to be open (Score 1) 382

It doesn't help that the TSA check points aren't always sufficiently staffed to run the Precheck lane(s). My home town airport often has the precheck lane closed. As a booby prize I get a car which lets me keep my shoes on, but I still have to take out my laptop and liquids. If they are serious about getting people to enroll in the program (which I did) than they damn well need to make sure that we can make use of it. How can they hope to convince people to pay the fees to enroll in precheck if they might not even get to make use of the program.

Comment Re:How I stopped hating tax and learned to love it (Score 1) 384

While overall this seems reasonable there is still the question of how the government proportions the money that it gives back? Does everyone get x/population dollars back? Is it based on how much people paid in taxes for dirty energy (which I think negates all benefits)? Does it get redistributed proportionate to income? Or inversely proportionate to income? In all cases you are going to have people complaining about it being unfair (for some definition of unfair).

The other issue is that unless all countries do the same it will just drive energy consumption from places which charge these tax-like-things to places that don't charge these tax like things. From a global CO2 level perspective it doesn't matter where it comes from, its all equally bad. (Generic pollution isn't as global, but it does have a non-trivial global component.)

Taxes should be about raising revenue. They should NOT be a mechanism for societal engineering because the people writing tax laws are simply not smart enough.

The only solution that I see is to 1) identify the carbon/pollution cost of a product, 2) charge a tax/fee for that amount when the product is sold, 3) uses the revenue to clean up pollution or capture carbon. Were we to start small (i.e. the fee charged represented the cost to clean up a fraction of a percent of the environmental cost) and slowly ramp up from there, we might be able to slowly disincentive pollution instead of just off shoring it.

Comment Re:C++ on an MCU? (Score 1) 677

Many of the issues that people have with using C++ on embedded systems are bunk. Here [1] is a recent discussion about C++ on embedded systems. Specifically to your point about C++ being too bloated [2] argues that the language itself isn't really.
[1] http://app.content.ubmtechelec...

Comment Depends on what field you go into (Score 1) 656

Honestly diffirential equations probably isn't the most important skill for a Comp Sci graduate to have. Outside of specific applications you'll probably never use it again. I never have. I wouldn't discount all higher math though. Most algebra related classes (discrete algebra, linear algebra) definately have applications and if you don't understant those you'll probably suffer for it. Just suck it up and deal with it. The system isn't about teaching you useful skills. The system is about proving that you can jump though hoops.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never call a man a fool. Borrow from him.