Comment Re:This is a good concept, but... (Score 1) 416
Textbooks are currently "proprietary" already. They cost a ton of money. A new edition is put out every couple of years, so a department or teacher has to choose weather or not to assign problems from different editions. If they don't, a student is forced to, if they have a previous edition, to compare the two editions problem by problem to see which ones are the same.
My professor, just yesterday, was talking about how, when an error is found, he must submit his questions to the publisher. Being somewhat cynical of textbook publishers motivations, I feel that their editing is not that stringent, so that it becomes "necessary" to publish new editions when enough errors are found by professors. I've taken chemistry in high school (10++ years ago), and am currently taking chemistry. Not much has changed between. Why the hell are several editions of a book necessary? Money.
Universities are slow bureaucratic beasts. They do not jump onto new technologies. My university currently uses Desire 2 Learn for it's online content. This is a significant improvement over Blackboard. It took them quite a while to make the switch. I am curious as to how much they paid for it. To have a free option using software many people are familiar with and likely have installed would save public universities, starved of funding, a nice chunk of change. The benefit seems good, but it will take a long time for universities to make the switch.
As for e-textbooks, PDFs suck for textbooks and turning pages and writin in the margins is great. But given the option of buying a paper book by a publisher squeezing every last cent out of students or buying a textbook online that a professor has made available (as long as it has gone through a peer reviewing process) I would jump at it. I can always print pages if necessary.