Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment False precision fallacy (Score 1) 199

Fahrenheit has smaller degrees so you never need to involve a decimal place.

Well actually, consumer-grade thermometers that are actually accurate within ±1F (or better) are far and few between. Fahrenheit is de facto false precision masquerading as a unit.
Combined with my other metrology pet peeve; digital meters showing more significant figures than their accuracy warrants for, those chinesium digital wall thermometers really grind my gears: "No, it's not 68.4F - it merely means it's most likely somewhere between 66.6 and 70.2F - you might as well roll a dice, you self-deluded bozo!"

Comment Re:Too slow (Score 1) 67

Why is it outdated thinking and what changes do you have in mind?
Remember that version numbers are mostly intended for developers (to keep track of code revisions), not end-users. My only gripe with version numbers would be that every developer seems to use their own definition of what's a major or a minor revision, rendering the decimal point moot.
But in the end, an arbitrary number is just that: an arbitrary number — and if you rather don't want to deal with that, Manjaro may be a distro for you.

Comment Re: Really... (Score 1) 169

It's even sadder than that: The extra cost of hiring people who were competent enough to recognise and mitigate the risks, would've likely been less than $580k.
In these harsh economic times, it's really a race to the bottom.

Comment Re:Who took the decision to undertake the work? (Score 2) 169

When I read in the HSE publication that the hapless person "was electrocuted when his forehead made contact with the 415V live terminals of the second unit", I immediately facepalmed. The apparent lack of safety awareness truly boggles my mind.

If he was not a competent person then he had no business attempting the work.

The sad truth is, that the incompetent don't realise that they're not competent at the job.

Comment So wrong - from a battery life perspective (Score 1) 182

Why do have my phone set up to hang onto wifi until it's completely gone and to heavily restrict data use when on cellular? Not because I have a crappy data plan - on the contrary.
It's all about battery life: pushing data across a flakey wifi link still consumes less enery than using [234]G. A function that tries to 'enhance your user experience' at the expense of battery life defeats its purpose, as nothing is as user-experience-killing as a low battery warning.

Slashdot Top Deals

I have ways of making money that you know nothing of. -- John D. Rockefeller

Working...