Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:There will always be some "lucky" people (Score 1) 357

Successful people usually make their own "luck" by doing things to better their odds. Bill Gates might be an example of both.

One of the major point in Outliers is actually that you are not in control of your own luck, but rather that geniuses are born from a series of random events (of which you have no influence) falling out their way.

Taking Bill Gates as an example, the author argues that had he not had the great fortune of having early access to computers at just the right time he might never had become what he is today. This access was provided through a series of fortunate events, basically allowing Bill Gates unlimited access to expensive computer time back in the 70's (I might be off a bit, I'm trying to recall the details from memory), all of which are described in the book.

Comment Great book, I recommend it (Score 1) 357

I've recently read the book, and I found it very interesting. It is well written and the author stays focused throughout the book.

The author argues convincingly for his views and presents multiple examples to back up his ideas. Personally I was intrigued by his idea that people are not born geniuses but are made genius through a series of random events falling out their way. The author doesn't argue that there is no such thing as inherited intelligence nor that everyones faith is determined purely by chance - rather he argues that the outcome is a fine balance between the two effects. To become successful you need high intelligence (on multiple levels) and the right opportunities (which constitute the element of chance).

From a philosophical (or religious) stand point you may not agree with his views, but the book is still a very good read and I highly recommend it.

Comment Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score 1) 612

That's why you include the present value of the discounted future rewards in your picture. As I said, it's something that has been studied for a long time, my only point is that you cannot simplify it into a single sentence based on gut feeling - however, I realize I made the same mistake by generalizing the remark about bottom line.

Comment Re:Require pay and benefits parity (Score 1) 612

I'm not some hippie liberal douche but I tend to believe that there are more important things than the bottom line. We owe it to future generations not to undercut our own population in the perpetual search for lower wages.

You do realize you are ignoring the entire field of Economics in your assessment, and relying on you gut feeling?

There's a reason we have spent hundreds of years studying these things, and it turns out there is actually nothing more important than the bottom line from the companies perspective.

Comment Re:Experience over education, 7 times out of 10 (Score 1) 372

I'd be interested to hear the reasoning behind this. How does not working show a lack of responsibility? We work to provide for ourselves. If I have the means to provide for myself without needing a job for an extended period and I choose to take advantage of it to take my time making sure when I do need employment I find some place where I am happy, how does that equate to being irresponsible?

The point is to do something valuable - be it work or hobby - work is optimal in the sense you have something to show for it. Saving babies from Malaria in Africa is even better. If you can't show any activities, then you are portraying that you spent the last 5 months sitting on the couch watching TV all day long. Companies will look to see if you are self-motivated, and the "sitting in the couch" phenomena is guaranteed to get you disqualified.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (4) How many times do we have to tell you, "No prior art!"

Working...