eglamkowski's Journal: sore gore

Poor Gore has enough sore loser in him to be a sore loser on Paul Martin's behalf, too. So sad.
http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=c6671bd6-570c-4e6b-8752-bc9fcf57c12e&k=27679
Gore accuses big oil of bankrolling Tories
Renata D'Aliesio and Katherine Monk, Calgary Herald; CanWest News Service
Published: Thursday, January 26, 2006

"The election in Canada was partly about the tar sands projects in Alberta," said former U.S. vice-president Al Gore.

----

On redeemding John McCain:
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060126-115353-4436r.htm
McCain, Coburn to force votes on pork spending
By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
January 27, 2006

We still can't ignore his sponsorship and support and voting in favor of blantantly unconstitutional bills, like the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act, but at least this is a step in the right direction.

Yeah

[Stargoat]

Yeah. It's funny that. Election fraud can really do a number on a person.

Re:Yeah

[neocon]

On the other hand, seeing Gore declare every election he doesn't like anywhere in the world `dishonest' or `fraudulent' sure puts his own Florida 2000 claims into perspective, don't it?

Re:Yeah

[Stargoat]

Yeah, it's nice seeing a conservative lie. Feels normal. You neocons really don't understand right and wrong, do you? You see, quotes are used to designate quotes, not make up lies. I know ethics is tough for you, given your complete lack of morals, but you're a big boy. You can do it!

For the record, Gore merely pointed out that big oil backed Stephen Harper, a man who condemned the Canadan government for not taking part in the Iraq Invasion. (Neocon, this is an excellent example of truth. Take no

Re:Yeah

[pudge]

For the record, Gore merely pointed out that big oil backed Stephen Harper, a man who condemned the Canadan government for not taking part in the Iraq Invasion.

And Communists have been the prime movers behind all the major antiwar demonstrations in this country. This, too, is truth.

Re:Yeah

[pudge]

Except, of course, that there was no more election fraud against Gore than there was in favor of him.

Stupid facts!

McCain

[pudge]

Bush actually signed an unconstitutional bill, so I still don't see why people think he's better on that point. At least McCain actually, truly, has worked for many years to cut pork, more than anyone else in DC, which is one big reason why I am favoring his candidacy at this point: I don't think anyone else can cut spending like he can. If it can be done, he's the only one who can do it, and I think you know I'm right. :-)