Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The highly educated are always right. (Score 0, Flamebait) 290

Your statements here are only have one inaccuracy. You claim Trump was friends with Epstein, which is simply propaganda spread by democrats and leftists. Trump actually banned Epstein from Mara Lago. Both Epstein & his puppet master Ghislaine Maxwell were in the business of blackmail. They were notorious for photobombs. Very recently Elon Musk posted on Twitter about Maxwell photobombing him. If you look at the photo you can easily notice that she's standing far enough behind him that he wouldn't have noticed her while posing for this picture...
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.gettyimages.com%2Fphotos%2Fghislaine-maxwell-and-elon-musk-attend-the-2014-vanity-fair-oscar-picture-id476317939%3Fs%3D612x612&f=1&nofb=1

Comment Re: The highly educated are always right. (Score 2) 290

Cite a reliable source, if you can't cite a reliable source, you are guilty of defamation and your comment is libel.
I doubt you can cite a reliable source for that claim. I know you can't, because you probably get your information from the Propaganda Media, who receive their daily news scripts from the same source, and is evident by reporting verbatim the exact same "narratives" and use the same catch phrases...OR, you get your news in 140 characters or less, either social media, or if you actually read news, fall for the Headline, rather than read the articles to the end. Even if you do read an entire article, I doubt you have ever questioned what you have read, nor ever verified with a reliable source, OR if you do verify the information, rely on snopes or factcheck, both funded by Organizations created by George Soros, or if you really want a fact, WikiPedia. And that's some funny shit. So many people have attempted to use WikiPedia to support their point, but none of them have ever looked up WikiPedia on WikePedia...have you? Nah, you aren't that bright, so here this is what WikiPedia says about WikiPedia;
"Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself."

Comment Re: The highly educated are always right. (Score -1, Troll) 290

WOW, "modern European cultural renaissance" I'll pass. The countries of the EU have almost destroyed their own culture with open boarders allowing large numbers of foreigners that are hostile to them, and their cultures. Be it Ireland, France, or Germany, soon, nothing will be left of the rich histories going back thousands of years.
It took 1400 years for the people of Spain to expel the Moors and reclaim their country. They still lost much of their culture that made them Spain...but we'll never know what they are, the changes were permanent.
There's nothing wrong with Emigration. IF, and this is HUGE! In the US there are those who have been indoctrinated to believe that anyone that comes to America should be allowed to. the US was was built during the industrial age to the most prosperous country in the world. Emigration was a big part of that, BUT, immigrants were required to meet certain criteria. First, they had to prove they could either support themselves, or had a sponsor that would support them. Allowing unlimited emigration of people who arrive and immediately become wards of the state is not a feasible solution. Would you go to the most crime ridden part of your country and invite people to live in your house not knowing if they will contribute to the household? What if they turn out to be a thief and steal you blind, or a rapist who rapes your wife. Or better yet, a killer that murders you and your family? NO! YOU WOULDN'T, yet that's exactly the policy that is adopted by the EU. I understand London is fast becoming muslim. In a century, do you think any of the history of England will be remembered by the people when the majority becomes not just people that are arab by blood, but those who would rather bring the culture they are allegedly escaping to England transforming it into the exact culture they left. It's just a stupid policy. If you allow immigrants that refuse to acclimate to your countries society and culture, you the identity of your country will be lost. It's apparent to me that the policies of the EU have already pushed Europe past the point of return. In another generation, the many diverse cultures that have always made Europe special will be transformed into exactly the opposite of "diversity. Rather than have the charm of different regions, the result will be the same as buying a tub of Neapolitan Ice Cream, and instead of being able to take a bite of Vanilla, Chocolate or Strawberry, you will be left with a slurry of shit colored non distinct mush...Not only will Europe become a bore, innovation will be lost as everyone will be the same, and if everyone is the same, innovation can never exist.
Good Luck, I don't expect I'll ever have the urge to visit since the French Rivera will be no different than the slums of London....a vast swirl of the same old shit everywhere....

Comment Re: The highly educated are always right. (Score -1, Redundant) 290

Many comments here confirm that there are two types of consumers of news. Those how received news from outlets producing Propaganda, and those who know they must question what is being broadcast or written as news, and verify the facts before accepting...and both are here. If you consume propaganda, you are unlikely to read this post completely, and are likely to assume I'm full of shit. And those who read this in completion, and verify what I've written. So, if you are tempted to stop reading, force yourself, there's a huge fact you are probably not aware of...
qanon has been gone for months now, so I find it interesting so many, liberals almost exclusively, are still talking about it. The same way they are still talking about Trump.
A larger problem is actually that of liberals who follow verifiable propaganda, which is vastly more dangerous than those who they consider misled by what they perceive as conspiracy.
The first thing one must examine before judging those who follow for example qanon, let's call them conspiracy theorists. Our other control group are those who watch main stream media, CNN, MSNBC, FOX...any of them, unaware they are propaganda. The first major difference you will find between the two groups are how they consume news.
Followers of the MSM tend get their news in 140 characters or less...meaning, they tend to assume the content of an article can be understood completely by reading the headline. Before you blow me up, I'll challenge you to get a New York Times read the Headline for the lead story, especially if it slants negative, or reporting on someone with a less than liberal ideology. You will notice that the first couple paragraphs will tend to support the headline, and this is by design. The average person reads less than half of an article. knowing this, the editors of the New York Times often, using crafty verbiage will cite the true facts at the very end of the article. This shields them from being sued for defamation, but the affects of the headline leaves the the perception in those that get their news by headline or twitter feed with a false understanding of what the true facts are...propaganda.
Another example that main stream media is primarily propaganda is rarely seen because one person may watch CNN, another MSNBC, another ABC, etc. People tend to stick with one source, and rarely can the MSNBC person convince the CNN person to switch, and vice versa. In reality, both are being fed the exact same story almost exclusively. And what I'm saying is they are being fed VERBATIM, the same stories.
You will find the anchors on CNN and MSNBC more often than not are reporting the same story in the EXACT SAME WORDS! I often wonder who writes what they are saying because too many are receiving the exact same script.
We all hear an ad on the radio repeat a phone number 3 times, because it's known it will be retained much more than saying it only once.
The technique is attributed to Dr. Paul Joseph Goebbels. In reality, Goebbels executed the technique, but his boss is the one that he got it from. It's even in his bosses book, Mein Kampf. If you are not familiar with the book, you may be familiar with the author. He's pretty famous. Adolph Hitler. Please feel free to fact check me, but please avoid the Soros funded sites and just get the book and read it.
now, the Qanon people are quite different. Instead of consuming news from one source, they tend to listen to and read multiple sources.
So, how do they distinguish fact from propaganda you ask. It's really not that difficult, instead of trusting facistbook or twatter or CNN with a piece of information, we resort to looking for and often finding documents in the Public Record that give us the answers.
Since we are in the midst of the Covid "pandemic" here are a few fun facts for you...
If you visit the CDC website, and you look at total deaths from ALL causes, you will find that more people died in 2019 than did in 2020. If we have a "pandemic" then those deaths numbers attributed to Covid, which is actually named SARS-CoV-2, then it should reflect approximately Total Number of Deaths in 2019 PLUS the reported deaths by Covid for example.
Look a bit deeper and you will find that deaths attributed to the common flu are almost non existent compare to every year records were kept.
They say everyone has to take the vaccine to save lives, yet the survival rate for people under 70 runs between 99.97% to 99.94% while over seventy or with pre existing conditions is 94.9% Hardly a reason to vaccinate, and foolish if you are aware that if you catch the virus, you are immune to it when you recover. While the vaccine is always one mutation behind, so the vaccination you take this year is for last years strain.
Media, WHO, CDC..and even PSAs push masks, but if you ask for studies that show empirical evidence that masks work, they can't provide it, I know, I've asked. And here's the kicker, there are a number of studies that say exactly the opposite, that masks cause respiratory infections, and have lasting psychological affects if one is forced to wear masks.
They compare this virus to the Spanish Flu of 1917. In case you didn't know, the first flu vaccination was distributed to stop the Spanish Flu. There is hard evidence on how many were saved by taking the vaccine. This number is 0% were saved by the vaccine. In fact, almost everyone that took the vaccine DIED! To make matters worse, widespread distribution caused what is called a vaccine-induced pandemic. A more modern example is available in India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation managed to lobby the Indian Government to mandate the polio vaccine. Polio was still seen in India, but it wasn't as bad a problem as it would become when the the polio vaccine mandated for everyone actually caused a vaccine induced pandemic.
When I see comments like I'm seeing here, referring to qanon followers as fringe conspiracy theorists by a larger group who primarily consume propaganda news sources, and never bother to check readily available public records to verify for themselves what they are being told. Qanon followers tend to avoid propaganda as much as possible, and check to confirm and verify what they do find before accepting anything as the gospel.
  The Smith-Mundt Act which went into effect in 1948 to protect American Citizens from propaganda.
In 2012, we were given the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012 by the administration in power. As often is the case, crafty verbiage was used to make the change appealing, but what it did is lift restrictions of propaganda to American Citizens allowing the collapse of a news industry that has always been somewhat bias. And here we are in 2021. Public Records providing overwhelming empirical evidence that masks don't work, and vaccines are ineffective against viruses, and more often than not, more deadly than the disease. There's also evidence of additional side effects connected to vaccines. For example, the current covid vaccines are likely to cause an epidemic that will reduce the birth rate in the United States by causing infertility in girls, and women of child bearing age.
Still, in the real world we see 75% to 90% of people walking around with masks on, even when driving in a car alone, and I've heard many almost begging for for a vaccine that will always be a year behind the current strain of Covid, just another coronavirus like the Common Cold, and the Seasonal Flu.
If you read this post to the end, the facts to support what I've said are out there for you to find. If you can't, feel free to contact me, eddbenson@ebo.net.
Remember, big pharma is not your friend, so one last piece of advice...
Keep your pharmaceuticals recreational! You will live longer, look better, and feel stronger!

Government

Bill To Ban All Salt In Restaurant Cooking 794

lord_rotorooter writes "Felix Ortiz, D-Brooklyn, introduced a bill that would ruin restaurant food and baked goods as we know them. The measure (if passed) would ban the use of all forms of salt in the preparation and cooking of food for all restaurants or bakeries. While the use of too much salt can contribute to health problems, the complete banning of salt would have negative impacts on food chemistry. Not only does salt enhance flavor, it controls bacteria, slows yeast activity and strengthens dough by tightening gluten. Salt also inhibits the growth of microbes that spoil cheese."
Space

Big Dipper "Star" Actually a Sextuplet System 88

Theosis sends word that an astronomer at the University of Rochester and his colleagues have made the surprise discovery that Alcor, one of the brightest stars in the Big Dipper, is actually two stars; and it is apparently gravitationally bound to the four-star Mizar system, making the whole group a sextuplet. This would make the Mizar-Alcor sextuplet the second-nearest such system known. The discovery is especially surprising because Alcor is one of the most studied stars in the sky. The Mizar-Alcor system has been involved in many "firsts" in the history of astronomy: "Benedetto Castelli, Galileo's protege and collaborator, first observed with a telescope that Mizar was not a single star in 1617, and Galileo observed it a week after hearing about this from Castelli, and noted it in his notebooks... Those two stars, called Mizar A and Mizar B, together with Alcor, in 1857 became the first binary stars ever photographed through a telescope. In 1890, Mizar A was discovered to itself be a binary, being the first binary to be discovered using spectroscopy. In 1908, spectroscopy revealed that Mizar B was also a pair of stars, making the group the first-known quintuple star system."

Slashdot Top Deals

This is a good time to punt work.

Working...