Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Good grief (Score 1) 647

Do you work for a casino or something? Your "argument" is crap. Any casino has no problem taking money from someone that is losing money. However, if someone wins "too much", the casino will kick you out.

How the fark is that fair? "Oh, if we can take your money, you can stay as long as you want.... if you take our money we can kick you out".

Screw the casinos. They are nothing more than legalized mafia because they have bribed our so called "representatives" with millions.

How the hell can you even try to defend a casino? They are scum and they should be brought down. Of course they will do well since they bribe all of our "representatives" with millions.

Taking money from "consumers" is a "good thing". Letting "consumers" take money from a big corp..... holly shiat bat-man, we have to stop that. Put people in jail, destroy their lives, anything... just don't let them take OUR money. Though it is "OK" if we take their money.

Comment Re:No (Score 1) 922

Any time there is a viable third candidate, no candidate will get 50%. That's a mathematical fact.

I'll see your mathematical fact and raise you a "try again"
Candidate #1 = 60% of the vote
Candidate #2 = 20% of the vote
Candidate #3 = 20% of the vote

And how about having 18 candidates getting 5% of the vote and the 19th guy getting 10% ? You want to have the guy with 10% winning? Didn't something like that happen in Europe somewhere? (sorry, can't remember)

Slashdot Top Deals

The first time, it's a KLUDGE! The second, a trick. Later, it's a well-established technique! -- Mike Broido, Intermetrics

Working...