Comment Re (Score 1) 113
Do I sense a disdained smell of jealousy in the air or is it just...my computer frying? Just because you were born into the world with a TI-94A on one hand, an 8088 on the other and a keyboard up your arse doesn't exactly make you the God of computers and therefore deserve to be interviewed (dayhem, I don't even know when the hell those things appeared on the market).
Come on, don't tell me that it took you more than 5 hours just to read up to the line of "I am 15." (If you did, I'm sorry to say that Slashdot just isn't the right place for you...) If you don't like the article/post/interview/whatever just because it's interviewing a 15 years old netizen, then don't read it. No one is force-feeding it to you.
For some of you who think that he hax0r3d AOL please read the article more carefully. He said that he stumbled across it. That's not exactly what I had in mind of the next great AOL hacker and his feat (hey, more oxymoron never hurt =). So please don't label him as an AOL-hacker-wannabe (at least in the scope of this interview).
For those of you who are complaining why Slashdot is "wasting" their time on this particular interview, let me just say one thing: You're certainly not paying Slashdot (at least not directly) to do an interview. Simply put, you don't have a say in what goes on in Slashdot. So shut up and sit down.
For all of you saying, "who cares about this kid," one comment - just look at yourself. Why are you taking the *precious* minutes of your life typing out that response if it was of no importance to you? Seriously, it probably took more time to type your response than to read the article.
For the rest of you who think that there are "better" people to interview...well, who are you to judge? Hell, if you can judge, I bet that the Slashdot interviewers are able to judge too.
For everyone who is a conjunction of the aforementioned sets (if people are in at least two of the domains, it's a conjunction...and if it's a disjunction, then there won't be anyone in the first place, which of course the statement would taken out before it's evaluated...classical logic here, not intuitionistic, or pretending to be =), you're just a conceded person who should've contributed to the Darwin Awards a long time ago...well, maybe that's not right, since stupidity is more important there, so you'd probably over qualify with that blindfold over your eyes.
And for everyone else, thank you for realizing (I always wonder why everyone uses an 's' instead of a 'z'...maybe because that's the right way to spell the word? =P) the integrity of our fellow netizen, and thank you for spreading your thoughts about proper parenting.
Come on, don't tell me that it took you more than 5 hours just to read up to the line of "I am 15." (If you did, I'm sorry to say that Slashdot just isn't the right place for you...) If you don't like the article/post/interview/whatever just because it's interviewing a 15 years old netizen, then don't read it. No one is force-feeding it to you.
For some of you who think that he hax0r3d AOL please read the article more carefully. He said that he stumbled across it. That's not exactly what I had in mind of the next great AOL hacker and his feat (hey, more oxymoron never hurt =). So please don't label him as an AOL-hacker-wannabe (at least in the scope of this interview).
For those of you who are complaining why Slashdot is "wasting" their time on this particular interview, let me just say one thing: You're certainly not paying Slashdot (at least not directly) to do an interview. Simply put, you don't have a say in what goes on in Slashdot. So shut up and sit down.
For all of you saying, "who cares about this kid," one comment - just look at yourself. Why are you taking the *precious* minutes of your life typing out that response if it was of no importance to you? Seriously, it probably took more time to type your response than to read the article.
For the rest of you who think that there are "better" people to interview...well, who are you to judge? Hell, if you can judge, I bet that the Slashdot interviewers are able to judge too.
For everyone who is a conjunction of the aforementioned sets (if people are in at least two of the domains, it's a conjunction...and if it's a disjunction, then there won't be anyone in the first place, which of course the statement would taken out before it's evaluated...classical logic here, not intuitionistic, or pretending to be =), you're just a conceded person who should've contributed to the Darwin Awards a long time ago...well, maybe that's not right, since stupidity is more important there, so you'd probably over qualify with that blindfold over your eyes.
And for everyone else, thank you for realizing (I always wonder why everyone uses an 's' instead of a 'z'...maybe because that's the right way to spell the word? =P) the integrity of our fellow netizen, and thank you for spreading your thoughts about proper parenting.
