I don't understand why anyone (except the car industry) would use MPG as a measurement by fuel efficiency. It's very misleading for most average (i.e. non math understanding) people.

Try this: which of those two options is a better fuel economy (better for the environment)?

1) Getting from 35 to 40 MPG
or
2) Getting from 15 to 17 MPG

You'd be tempted to say #1. 5 against 2, easy!

But, if you look at it from a L per 100km perspective, you get this:

1) is getting from 8.1 L/100km to 7.1 L/100km. (diff. of 1L)

2) is getting from 18.8 L/100km to 16.6 L/100km. (diff. of 2.2L)

So, #2 is actually a better fuel economy...

At the very least, MPG should be GPM if you -really- must go imperial....

Ever got a fever? 37C is the normal body temperature, but between 37.0C and 38.9C, there's a big difference and any decent body thermometer will display the decimal...

I, for one, am very happy that the Celsius option is winning by a long shot ! Maybe that will help them understand...

You really should come to Canada around mid-February and I guarantee you'll never ever say that again!

Oh, and ever heard of "wind chill"? Feels like -35C (note the minus sign) sometimes and I'm not even in the far-northern parts!

On another note: Fahrenheits!?! Come on Slashdot, arrive in the 21st century!

Obviously, the server's down. But I got through by going around to http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/

Direct link that work for me : http://download.mozilla.org/?product=firefox-3.0&os=win&lang=en-US