Admittedly, retail profit margins are pretty thin, however, they aren't uniformly thin. There are certain product that are loss leaders, and there are some that have a healthy profit margin. (Like electrical wire at Home Depot is historically relatively cheap, but the wire nuts that you use as connectors aren't.)
Something like this would be a one time investment that you could amortize over many months, if not years... making it very cheap in the long run. And even if it only steers 1% of the public to a higher profit item, it'll pay for itself... on top of that, it can be a "upsell" to products that don't have good shelf space, they could pay to advertise their product more often than others. And that would be considered gravy...
How the hell is this news for nerds? How many times has the Palin or Bush or Wikipedia pages been defaced? Don't recall it being trumpeted here...
At least a pretense of impartiality would be welcome...
Actually, the changing of a wikipedia entry kind of makes it news for nerds. They didn't post the plethora of articles about the Palin gaffe, they posted the one that pertained to geek culture, i.e. the one about wikipedia. I'd say that answers the "How the hell is this news for nerds?" question.
Partiality? Please... to begin with, ever since Fox "news" started broadcasting opinion rather than facts, mainstream media has pretty much went into the crapper. And expecting impartiality amongst nerds? With the Mac acolytes, the Windows vs Linux wars, and the emacs vs vi vs ed neverending debates, you sir, are WAY more of an optimist than I am.
PS Full disclosure... Macs are good for graphics and layout, not real business; Linux; Vi all the way; Palin is a tool.
IANALBIHADIL (I Am Not a Lawyer But I Hold a Degree in Law, there must be a shorter one for this - any suggestions?)
ISHAS
"I still have a soul." or maybe LDWMF? (Law Degree with moral fiber?)
Just kidding, some of my best minions are lawyers...
-D
We may find it annoying, but we absolutely should not avoid it. In fact, we should being doing it more often.
While your point is valid... as a sometimes "asker of novice questions," I can tell you that the only thing worse than not getting the answers you need, is being made to feel like crap for asking the question in the first place. And if someone doesn't want to answer questions, that's usually what comes across, whether it's intended or not.
Here's a real-life example that happened to a buddy of mine... (noob) "I'm on system (x) running (y) and I've tried (a), (b), and (c)... What do you think I should do?" (a-hole guru) "Learn to troubleshoot."
Now, I'm not saying that people shouldn't help, I'm just saying that if they don't want to help, they shouldn't... sometimes it helps the open source movement more if some people just stick to whatever it is they do best, and leave the human interaction to those that actually like people.
That's just my $.02, feel free to disregard.
-D
The first rule of intelligent tinkering is to save all the parts. -- Paul Erlich