Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Deceleration energy increases with speed (Score 1) 47

It seems like this is just some research group noodling on advanced rocket concepts, not whether they are practical or not. Any increase in SPEED to destination results in an EQUAL need to decelerate at the destination. Deceleration can occur through gravity assisted capture or aerobraking, but none of the more complex strategies for getting rid of velocity at the destination is really used because they're very inaccurate compared to a capture burn.

That's why I'll always be skeptical of these sort of promises of extreme performance being beneficial. There are very few cases where a doubling of velocity in space travel is important. You can always exchange speed for time.

Comment It's gone far beyond "cloud seeding" (Score -1) 18

Cloud seeding isn't new, just using drones to do it.

Indeed it isn't. They doing it all day long, every day here in the USA and around the world. It's called "geoengineering", "weather modification" or "chemtrails" depending on who you're talking to. It goes far beyond just making a rainstorm or two here or there.

Also, building cities interrupts large chaotic systems, literally affecting the climate in the area of the city. Perhaps we should stop building cities.

Now there's a sensible idea.

As with anything humans do, we need to be aware of, and manage, side effects.

Lucifer is great at solving problems. He has to be, as he's always causing them.

Hopefully the massive widescale weather experiment we are all unwittingly or helplessly a part of won't have any devastating consequences years or generations down the line. "What could possibly go wrong?"

Comment Nope. That's not it. (Score -1) 12

All this is theater exactly the same way that Microsoft anti-trust thing years ago was theater. Just bread and circuses.

All of these companies have one thing in common: they were founded by US intelligence. They are proprietary fronts. None of these "companies" organically arose due to "capitalism" or "free market" or whatnot. All of their founding myths are bullshit. It's intel dollars at work.

Look up who Jeff Bezos' grandfather was. (Preston Gize was his name.) Big shot at DARPA. You think it was a coincidence this guy ended up as head of Amazon? Just a really smart guy who happened to be in the right place at the right time?

Comment banks have deposits to have outflows? (Score 1, Interesting) 79

I have not kept more than 2 months worth of cash in my bank for 15 years. I find it hard to believe many people keep significant amounts of cash in banks anymore. Are there even balances that could outflow to stablecoins? Who keeps piles of cash in a bank while you could hold stocks, mutual funds, bitcoin etc. Stablecoins aren't a threat at all, unless a new kind of bank appears that replaces trad banks in utility by using a stable coin.

Comment How? (Score 0) 22

what regulatory vehicle do they hope to use? Coinbase and Robinhood can by stocks, and then sell tokens of them under whatever shrink wrapped license agreement they want.

This is only a risk to the markets if there is a violation of holding the underlying security. Regulators should do what they can to avoid another FTX situation, where FTX sold Bitcoin but held none, and their position, which was effectively short bitcoin, blew up in their face, which is what bitcoin does when entities try to manipulate it.

My greatest fear is the stock exchanges resistance to tokenization is their realizeation is that their utility may be nearing an end. The leap between actual security and a token of a secuity that is digitally tradable is within grasp once these tokenized markets gather momentum. Regulation for anti-competitive reasons is ill advised.

Slashdot Top Deals

If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it will serve us right. -- Alistair Cooke

Working...