Yeah? And if you're suspected of orchestrating an anthrax attack, your browser history probably will (and should) be used as evidence of your guilt.
I disagree "anthrax" on its own is just a simple word he could have been looking for symptoms or effects theres no proof of intent anywhere there also how can they justify useing search history as evidence when they cant even prove who was sitting at the computer at the time?
How awful is it that detectives were able to discover that her husband searched for information on the exact thing that killed her shortly before her death, along with other methods of killing someone. On top of that he attempted to delete traces of it. This is an invasion of piracy.
Normally in murder cases the significant other of the victim is the primary suspect. As such I would assume (Didn't RTFA so not sure if there is more detail) that it was pretty easy to get a warrant for his house, computer, bank statements, etc. etc.
he consented to letting them look so a warrant was unnessicary
The easiest way to figure the cost of living is to take your income and add ten percent.
