Here's his last attempt to wriggle out of being proven wrong *again*.

You are funny. I know lots of people with lots of OpenSSL experience who are saying the OpenSSL documentation is shit. In fact, on most of the posts I've read on the subject, they say the test code is the best documentation -- they're right. That was what I used. It works now, so you seem to be flawed in your understanding.

Why are there so many?

Having gone through that whole argument with yet *another* person who thinks they can "hide the HTML" I'm starting to think some sort of IQ test is the only way.

I guess he couldn't handle being proven wrong. He appears to have slunk off with his tail between his legs. There were no replies to my last comments ... at which point he *finally* seemed to be getting some sort of clue as to why he might be wrong. Couched, of course, in cowardly "I always knew that!" terms, but I think it was in fact sinking in!

I notice that my favourite Javascript weenie, woogieoogieboogie, has run and hidden himself away, to be consoled by his boyfriend, and presumably, a case of malt liquor.

So, I guess he's *finally* realized it's impossible to "hide the source" from browsers, and is too cowardly too reply.

Perhaps he's read those specs he posted. How embarrassing for him.

So, if you look at his posting history, you'll be able to laugh along as he gets many things wrong: