if you come to us with a codebase that uses RSA

What does this mean? If I come to you .... as what?

I'm pretty sure that what they mean is: "if you come to us as a customer." I believe that one of the main services that Trail of Bits provide to their customers is doing security audits. And what they're saying here is: don't bother asking us to audit a codebase which uses RSA, we're already telling you now that chances are very high that it is vulnerable in one way or another, asking us to actually audit it for you will probably just be a waste of your money paying for our time to do so, you're probably better off spending that money on replacing the RSA with something else (they discuss alternatives in the their post)...

Not saying I agree (or disagree) with their assessment, just trying to clarify what I think they meant...

Check out https://matrix.org/ -- might just be what you're looking for, looks very promising so far...!

Check out https://matrix.org/ -- federated, open source, open spec. it's still being actively developed, but from what I've seen so far it's looking really solid, and seems like a good development community, too... End-to-end encryption isn't yet finalized, but it's said to be coming soon...

Depends how those billions are allocated...

Also check-out this analysis of the "massacre" at Shijaiyah (warning: some of the content is pretty graphic). While I'm not convinced that everything in the analysis is 100% correct, the basic gist seems pretty indisputable...

Actually, it's pretty easy: those for bringing in goods end up in Egypt, the terror tunnels end up in Israel. Also, stashes of arms being stored in the tunnels may provide a hint as to their purpose...

Oops, imagine their surprise when they found out their tunnels (aimed at "getting food") ended up in Israel! Do you think they were planning to go to the nearest Israeli supermarket and buy some food to take home?

You might be interested in reading this article.

This article is quite relevant to the above claim...

True, it is not a critical review, though it is by someone who is willing to admit mistakes in the face of evidence. Care to share links to some serious reviews "written by the skeptical contingent of climate scientists"? (An honest request, I'm not trying to imply there are none...).

This report is also reviewed over at Slate by the Bad Astronomer.

A year ago almost to the day a very similar question was discussed here: http://ask.slashdot.org/story/... But I'll respond the same way I did there: Science News!

Quoting the Project Ara website: "Introducing Project Ara. Designed exclusively for 6 billion people." That would qualify as "the masses", I think...