Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Same here... (Score 1) 193

... as dozens of comments above. Xfce on my main box at work (I'm actually typing this on my Mint/Mate laptop): for people who have a real job and just need a functional computer. This said, most of the time my entire screen contains 3-4 bash shells (and a browser, and possibly Emacs), so ok, perhaps I'm not a typical desktop user.

Comment Re:Linux needs more desktop forks (Score 1) 185

This. I am actually looking for an alternative for Windows 8 (the first OS that I've ever seen that deliberately impedes your work flow), but my previous Linux experiences have left a bad taste in my mouth. From the perspective of a 20-year Windows user, there are two things that would make Linux much more attractive. First, a Linux equivalent to InstallShield, one which detects and installs dependencies, allows configuration customizations, shows you what it's going to do, asks your approval, and then lets you know what it's doing as proceeding and gives you usable error messages. The second would be a file manager which gives a new user 1) some idea where is an appropriate location to save user files, and 2) some system that shows users what is an executable file, a config file, a library, etc. as easily as a user can tell from the Windows file extensions. The idea of repositories is nice, but having to figure out what to do with the tarball, rpm, whathaveyou, file, wandering about until you find the install directory, flailing about until you figure out which is the executable, trying to launch it while guessing which switches are appropriate, and then finding that it requires some uninstalled prerequisite file (or worse, a different version of one you have installed), is absurd. I liked what I got working in the couple of Linux installed I've done (except the bog-slow version of Google Earth), but getting to that point was ridiculously more difficult than it should have been.

I have the feeling that what you have in mind is rpm-based repositories as of 2003. Modern deb-based distros (of course Debian, but Mint and Ubuntu too) make software installing/uninstalling as painless as humanly possible. Synaptic is your friend.

Comment Re:O RLY? (Score 1) 602

Here's the reason men like me will buy products like this:

In general, Western women are just a pain in the ass to be around.

IMHO, the views expressed in your post show very clearly why. No woman above the desperation level would want to hang out with a sexist jerk like you. And before you react to my post as "feminist bullshit", please note that I am a straight male. Actually, I happen to like women.

Comment Re:Reply from a programmer that knows no statistic (Score 2, Informative) 572

You probably still think I am a lunatic, but hear me out.

You don't qualify as a lunatic; just as someone who has no idea of what he's talking about. Absolutely no idea. Your post, my friend, is so full of ideas you obviously misunderstood that I won't even attempt to make a list.

And yes, I do statistics for a living.

Open Source

Linux Kernel 2.6.32 Released 195

diegocg writes "Linus Torvalds has officially released the version 2.6.32 of the Linux kernel. New features include virtualization memory de-duplication, a rewrite of the writeback code faster and more scalable, many important Btrfs improvements and speedups, ATI R600/R700 3D and KMS support and other graphic improvements, a CFQ low latency mode, tracing improvements including a 'perf timechart' tool that tries to be a better bootchart, soft limits in the memory controller, support for the S+Core architecture, support for Intel Moorestown and its new firmware interface, run-time power management support, and many other improvements and new drivers. See the full changelog for more details."

Slashdot Top Deals

panic: kernel trap (ignored)

Working...