Never been in turbulence before? Could be a wild ride.

Those further away from the axis of rotation most certainly move differently and feel different forces. In a conventional aircraft the passengers are all very close to the axis of rotation during a banking (rolling) maneuver and see roughly the same forces.

St. Louis is number 1 for murder on this list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... I suspect that has just a little something to do with that 6.9/100,000 for the state. But that's just me. And the stats.

So the fact that 2/3 of gun related deaths are suicide in the US seems like it's full of shit? To who? Japan has high rate of suicide vs. low gun ownership...US has high suicide rate vs. high gun ownership. No correlation. Chandler's low homicide rate vs. Detroit's (100 times higher). No correlation. New Hampshire vs. Louisiana (10 times higher). No correlation. So let's only look at averages with the assumption of "first world only". Instead let's look at why people in certain small geographical locations in the US kill each other at such high rates and look for a root cause to that violence. When we do look closer we see young black males killing each other at horrific rates. Why is that happening and why won't we do anything about it? My answer...it creates an average statistic useful for pushing gun control and recognizing it would reflect poorly on the politicians in control of those areas.

I said " uncomfortable truth that drug related gang violence in the inner cities and suicide (2/3 of gun related deaths) are driving our overall homicide rates" so I obviously think it's a problem. Are guns causing suicide? Ask the folks in Japan. Sounds like you aren't willing to look for the root causes and actually solve these problems. If you think we can solve gun violence the same way we're "solving" drug overdose related deaths, by banning drugs and spending billions of dollars on a "war" on them, then you should prepare for same the results.

I agree we shouldn't be having this problem. Comparing averages is our first mistake. We have data right in front of our eyes, Chandler v.s Chicago, and many others we can look at and see where things are going wrong. If we don't want to confront the uncomfortable truth that drug related gang violence in the inner cities and suicide (2/3 of gun related deaths) are driving our overall homicide rates above those of the developed world then we won't solve the problem of a high average homicide rate vs. the first world. If we just say, well most homicides are committed with guns so they must be causing the problem, then we won't solve the problem. Unless private ownership of guns is the real "problem" one wants to solve. Then our high homicide rate is useful and efforts to reduce it counterproductive to that end.

Why are things so bad in Detroit but not in Austin TX or Chandler AZ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Detroit has stricter gun laws than Austin or Chandler. It doesn't seem to me that the "solution" that the rest of the first (cherry picked) world has implemented is working in Detroit. Plenty of second and third world countries have extremely restrictive gun laws and have homicide rates much higher than the US. Just maybe there is another overriding factor, or factors, we need to consider. Let's help the people who need it the most first even if it means recognizing that guns are not the problem. That seems unlikely to happen though.

Then let's concentrate our efforts on those areas and the real problem, gang violence, and leave me and my guns alone.

No cherry picking at all. I referenced ALL the data not just the "average" which would be cherry picking seeing how the average misrepresents the vast majority of the country and the hell holes where the homicide rate is 10 times the average. The point is that guns aren't the problem else the homicide rate in all the rest of the country would be high as well. Fix the real problem. Drug gang violence. Or leave those worst affected by the violence to suffer and continue to push gun control.

Remove small geographical areas in just 6-8 of our largest cities and the US homicide rate drops to one of the lowest, if not the lowest, in the world. That's the fact hidden, and purposely ignored by gun grabbers, in the average homicide rate folks like to trot out. Those of us who live outside of those few dozen square miles of the US don't want, or need, any of the idiotic gun control laws that routinely get trotted out as "solutions" to gun related homicide. Drug gang violence is what you should start looking at if you want to solve the vast majority of our gun homicide problem. But then you would have to actually want to solve the violence problem, not just use an out of context statistic as justification to take peoples guns away.

That's BS. Negative camber is no more or less stable than positive. Positive camber was specified in cars for decades. Only recently, 10-20 years, has 0 or slight negative started to become the norm. Can you say "wide low profile tires".

This POS tire is cone shaped. Roll a cone and what happens? It turns. The outside edge of this tire has a larger circumference that the inside edge. One edge of the tire wants to go further than the other edge per revolution. Tire wear will be horrible. This is a solution to a "problem" no one is interested in solving.