Comment Re:easily validated? (Score 4, Insightful) 102
I'd burn the entire back catalogue for another Andor.
I'd burn the entire back catalogue for another Andor.
Hopefully they'll add a PIN so we can have two things to try and memorise.
Donâ(TM)t give up the fight or youâ(TM)ll wish you hadâ(TM)t.
Blinders? Surely a single blinder is precisely enough to force people to switch to vertical.
Yeah, I'm definitely aware of the original reference. I always like the crossover, but also wondered if it was legal. Looking back, it's seems trivial.
"feels more like Starcraft" than traditional coding
YOU MUST CONSTRUCT ADDITIONAL POINTERS
What are we switching to now, guys? TeamSpeak? Ventrilo? Skype? ICQ?
Can't wait to brick one of these things.
Finally some AI news!
Surely they'll need a few modifications before that's viable. For instance, are the currently available AI Agents even capable of accepting multi-million dollar pay-outs?
SomethingAwful had some enlightening content back in the day.
There's no easy fix. If laws need to be properly reviewed, they won't be able to sneak in the corrupt parts!
Y'all got any of those onion mesh networks hiding in the silos?
I've only experienced two useful things about emojis scattered through text:
1. It tells me that the text was written by an LLM (before the propter explicitly requests it to stop doing so).
2. It also tells me that the text was potentially written by someone between the ages of 12 and 22 (and probably written by AI).
Anyone know how the internet was framed as back in 2006?
Real computer scientists don't program in assembler. They don't write in anything less portable than a number two pencil.