A million years ago when I got my first management job I had to attend a training session on 'Goals and Objectives', the current in vogue management tool. The instructor impressed on us that 'you get what you measure'. He used an example of police wanting to improve road safety by measuring the number of moving violation tickets given out. Ticket quantities went through the roof but there was no improvement in accident rates; go figure. What was true in the 70s is still true today.

My house, all the time. It. Ain't. Funny.

I have two hearing impaired elders in my life. Voice to text fails for the same reason as hearing aids; everything gets converted to text. The fallback is just yelling or hand written notes.

Companies just started merging with or acquiring other firms for no apparent reason. Tecnicon was one of the original firms building hospital lab equipment. If you've ever had a 'Chem 12', 'Chem 24' or similar lab profile, those were developed by Technicon. Nearly every lab in the US had Technicon gear.

The 80's hit and Technicon was aquired by Revlon and Pantry Pride Grocery. WTF???
This crap with AI smacks of the same nonsense.

"I can disable plenty of them in the Settings". This. As far as I know, I've shut down all the ad-like features in the browser and it wasn't all that difficult. When I get a new device, it's just a few clicks to clean up the UI. If there's anything left, it's not annoying enough for me to even notice it.

I see what you did there. Took quite a shot at the vendor.

asked to hit 'any key'????? Oh the horror!

We're going to reach a point where the tech to do this kind of thing is pretty close to invisible. It's going to be interesting when that happens.

Blue dot in red state here. Farmland is currently zoned as agricultural across most of Georgia. Two main categories exist; exclusive (use as farm only) and non-exclusive. I'm not going to search all 3 zillion counties property maps to see what the balance is but the state does use zoning to protect land.
FWIW, zoning can be challenged and changed so just because something is zoned agricultural now means nothing.
A better long-term solution is to establish a permanent conservation easement. As said elsewhere in this bit of thread, these options require the land-owner push to get the specific zoning category. I can see why a farmer would not want to restrict what their land could be used for in the event that they get old and the kids might or might not want to keep farming.
No simple answer to this problem because it's not A problem but Many problems all balled into one thing.

My spouse has felt for some time she had some type of arrhythmia. In office ECGs never detected anything. She has a Samsung watch (not the latest version) that detects abnormal heart patterns. It pops up with 'you have AFib'. Meh, figures it's bogus. During one of her episodes, she initiates an ECG, AFib is the result. At a regular doc visit she mentions it to her PCP. They open up the app, find the displayed data, and doc concurs; she has AFib. They do a 24 hr monitor and confirm AFib. In conversations with her PCP and the cardiologist the docs confirm that they're seeing people with smart watches that do, in fact, have things like AFib that are confirmed on further testing. This seems to be a real thing. I'm sure there are false positives and likely false negatives so it would be good to have actual clinical data but in the absence of real studies, if you have one of these that pops a message, see your doc.

Well, if that happens, then no, not what I want. I'll evaluate every instance of LLM assisted shopping experience. If it works, hey, happy day for me. If not, then I just don't deal with that merchant again.
I've been on the end of badly implemented LLM answering service too. Called a medical center and needed to connect to a specific department. Turns out there are two similar departments, each dealing with different body parts and the LLM directed me to the wrong one. Not just me, but everyone who called. Meh, they'll get it fixed.

That is a great question and, upon reflection, think that systems should identify as a bot and offer an option to speak to a human somewhere in the Q&A process. As I said, my order was bog standard but it's possible I could have asked for human assistance if I needed to change something from non-standard. Systems should make it clear that human help is available and how to get to that person.

FWIW, non-LLM automated answering systems (press 1 for , 2 for and none of them are what I really need) have suffered from this issue since forever and often make it impossible to reach help (I've had these systems just disconnect me if I failed to use the allowed prompt responses). So, bad customer service already exists without LLMs.

A few weeks back I called a BBQ restaurant in Vero Beach FL to order dinner. A very pleasant woman answered the phone and asked for my order. It took about 15 seconds to realize I was speaking to a bot (bonus points, it was the first day of roll-out) and I'm thinking 'here we go, gonna be another '11th floor elevator' sketch'. TL;DR, it worked perfectly for my order. Nothing I said was misinterpreted and the final order was exactly as I ordered. I spoke to another customer while I was waiting for my pickup and they did have an issue because they wanted something changed on one item (more/different sauce or something) so they hung up and just came in to place the order. If/when I order again, I may try and modify a standard order just to see what happens. I'm also curious to see if the restaurant sticks with the system.

So, for something like this, LLMs might actually work or at least work enough to make it worth while.

The ability to share data across the world improves medical care. If a local physician can't quite read a scan, the scan can be shared to instantly which improves the overall care the patient receives. That's why you want this stuff on a network.

I work in the medical device industry and none of this is all that new. It's clear that the FDA wants companies it regulates to THINK ABOUT RISK and then show that you've mitigated the relevant risks and can prove that's true. It's not rocket science, and doesn't have to be that expensive. When you build a network, you figure this stuff out anyway; all the FDA wants you to do is WRITE DOWN what you did.

It can be a pain, but it doesn't have to be any more painful that good basic application control and change management.

So, I had this friend several years back, who looked at driving safety another way. The goal is to make the driver VERY careful. His recommendation was to remove all safety gear; no seat belts, no head rests, no radar, nothing. Now, put a big metal spike right in the middle of the steering wheel and point it at the driver's solar plexus. Oh yeah, I'm not gonna hit anything EVER with that setup.