Comment Re:Yeah (Score 1) 756
Rebuttals from the ID camp contain no such expertise or references, and are usually based on long refuted arguments against evolution, but little or nothing that truly supports ID.
Actually, you know, I have heard a well-based defense of ID, based on "irreducible complexity," which with all the latest in technology, and knowledge of DNA, and genome projects, actually, hasn't been refuted, but is even more strongly supported.
And in regard to expertise and references, I believe that the biologists who worked on the human genome project are probably among the most qualified of all. Funny thing, though... by the time they finally finished mapping the human genome, every last one of them believed in Intelligent Design, thinking it impossible for such a mass of intricate complexity to have evolved spontaneously.
